Seventeen-year evaluation of breast cancer screening: the DOM project, The Netherlands

被引:26
作者
Miltenburg, GAJ [1 ]
Peeters, PHM [1 ]
Fracheboud, J [1 ]
Collette, HJA [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Sch Med, Julius Ctr Patient Oriented Res, NL-3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
breast cancer; mammographical screening; long-term evaluation; case-control study;
D O I
10.1038/bjc.1998.609
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The DOM project is a non-randomized population-based breast cancer screening programme in Utrecht which started in 1974-75. The 17-year effect has been evaluated by a case-control study of breast cancer deaths during the period 1975-92 in women living in the city of Utrecht, born between 1911 and 1925, whose breast cancers were diagnosed after the initiation of the DOM project. Controls (three for each case) were defined as women having the same year of birth as the case, living in the city of Utrecht at the time the case died, and having had the opportunity of screening in the DOM project. Screening in the period 1975-92 indicated a breast cancer mortality reduction of 46% (odds ratio of 0.54, 95% confidence interval 0.37-0.79). The strongest protective effect was found at a screening interval of 2 years or less (mortality reduction of 62%, odds ratio of 0.38), and for the highest number of screens (mortality reduction of 68%, odds ratio of 0.32 for more than four screens). Exclusion of breast cancer deaths that occurred within 1 year of diagnosis, to allow for 'lead-time' bias, gave an odds ratio of 0.61, Early diagnosis of breast cancer by screening reduces breast cancer mortality in the long term. Bias due to the study design may slightly overestimate the protective effect. A screening programme with a 2-yearly, or smaller, interval between successive screens will improve the protection of screening.
引用
收藏
页码:962 / 965
页数:4
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   NHS breast screening programme: Is the high incidence of interval cancers inevitable? [J].
Asbury, D ;
Boggis, CRM ;
Sheals, D ;
Threlfall, AG ;
Woodman, CBJ .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 313 (7069) :1369-1370
[2]  
Breslow NE, 1980, STATISTICAL METHODS, P162
[3]  
COLLETTE HJA, 1984, LANCET, V1, P1224
[4]   FURTHER EVIDENCE OF BENEFITS OF A (NONRANDOMIZED) BREAST-CANCER SCREENING-PROGRAM - THE DOM PROJECT [J].
COLLETTE, HJA ;
DEWAARD, F ;
ROMBACH, JJ ;
COLLETTE, C ;
DAY, NE .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 1992, 46 (04) :382-386
[5]   ATTEMPTS TO EVALUATE A NON-RANDOMIZED BREAST-CANCER SCREENING-PROGRAM (THE DOM-PROJECT) [J].
COLLETTE, HJA .
MATURITAS, 1985, 7 (01) :43-50
[6]   NATIONWIDE BREAST-CANCER SCREENING IN THE NETHERLANDS - SUPPORT FOR BREAST-CANCER MORTALITY REDUCTION [J].
DEKONING, HJ ;
FRACHEBOUD, J ;
BOER, R ;
VERBEEK, ALM ;
COLLETTE, HJA ;
HENDRIKS, JHCL ;
VANINEVELD, BM ;
DEBRUYN, AE ;
Van Der Maas, PJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1995, 60 (06) :777-780
[7]  
DEKONING HJ, 1995, JNCI-J NATL CANCER I, V87, P1217
[8]  
DEWAARD F, 1986, DOM PROJECT VROEGE O
[9]  
*EGRET, 1990, STAT PACK
[10]  
HAKAMA M, 1995, LANCET, V345, P221