Allocation of product-related carbon emission abatement target in a make-to-order supply chain

被引:75
作者
Ren, Jie [1 ]
Bian, Yiwen [2 ]
Xu, Xiaoyan [3 ]
He, Ping [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sci & Technol China, Sch Management, Hefei, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Univ, Sch Business, SHU UTS SILC Sydney Inst Language & Commerce, Shanghai 200041, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Management, Hangzhou 310058, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Make-to-order (MTO) supply chain; Product-related carbon emission abatement target (PCEAT); Allocation; Stackelberg game; Carbon emission abatement limit; CLIMATE-CHANGE; PERFORMANCE; FOOTPRINTS; COUNTRY; STOCK;
D O I
10.1016/j.cie.2014.12.007
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
This paper investigates the product-related carbon emission abatement target (PCEAT) allocation problem in a decentralized make-to-order supply chain, which is composed of a manufacturer and a retailer. The product-related carbon emissions here refer to the total emissions generated from the product manufacturing and retailing processes. To effectively reduce carbon emissions on the product level in the whole supply chain, a compulsory PCEAT is imposed on each unit of product. The problem is how to allocate the PCEAT between the manufacturer and the retailer, where the allocator can be either firm. We use Stackelberg game models to solve this problem by considering the following four scenarios: (1) the manufacturer is the leader and the allocator; (2) the manufacturer is the follower and the allocator; (3) the retailer is the follower and the allocator; and (4) the retailer is the leader and the allocator. Ignoring the carbon emission abatement limits of firms, it is found that if the leader is the allocator, the proportions of the PCEAT allocated to the two participators are determined by their marginal abatement costs. If the follower is the allocator, the PCEAT will be completely allocated to the leader. When the abatement limits of firms are taken into consideration, the firm constrained by the limit will undertake the portion of PCEAT up to its limit; while the other firm should undertake the remaining part. In any case, we find that it is always not bad to let the leader allocate the PCEAT. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 194
页数:14
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Green supply chains with carbon trading and environmental sourcing: Formulation and life cycle assessment
    Abdallah, Tarek
    Farhat, Ali
    Diabat, Ali
    Kennedy, Scott
    [J]. APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2012, 36 (09) : 4271 - 4285
  • [2] Estimates of GHG emission reduction potential by country, sector, and cost
    Akimoto, Keigo
    Sano, Fuminori
    Homma, Takashi
    Oda, Junichiro
    Nagashima, Miyuki
    Kii, Masanobu
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (07) : 3384 - 3393
  • [3] Corporate social responsibility in supply chains of global brands:: A boundaryless responsibility?: Clarifications, exceptions and implications
    Amaeshi, Kenneth M.
    Osuji, Onyeka K.
    Nnodim, Paul
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2008, 81 (01) : 223 - 234
  • [4] [Anonymous], TESC CAS STUD
  • [5] Bagchi D., 2013, MECH DESIGN SUSTAINA, P37
  • [6] Benjaafar S., 2010, IEEE T AUTOM SCI ENG, DOI [DOI 10.1109/TASE.2012.2203304, 10.1109/TASE.2012.2203304]
  • [7] Forests and climate change: Forcings, feedbacks, and the climate benefits of forests
    Bonan, Gordon B.
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2008, 320 (5882) : 1444 - 1449
  • [8] Environmentally responsible inventory models: Non-classical models for a non-classical era
    Bonney, Maurice
    Jaber, Mohamad Y.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2011, 133 (01) : 43 - 53
  • [9] Carbon Labelling and Low-income Country Exports: A Review of the Development Issues
    Brenton, Paul
    Edwards-Jones, Gareth
    Jensen, Michael Friis
    [J]. DEVELOPMENT POLICY REVIEW, 2009, 27 (03) : 243 - 267
  • [10] Butner K., 2008, Mastering carbon management: balancing tradeoffs to optimize supply chain efficiencies