Historical background: why is it important to improve automated particle selection methods?

被引:20
作者
Glaeser, RM [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Mol & Cell Biol, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Phys Biosci Div, Lawrence Berkeley Natl Lab, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jsb.2003.09.005
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
A current trend in single-particle electron microscopy is to compute three-dimensional reconstructions with ever-increasing numbers of particles in the data sets. Since manual-or even semi-automated-selection of particles represents a major bottleneck when the data set exceeds several thousand particles, there is growing interest in developing automatic methods for selecting images of individual particles. Except in special cases, however, it has proven difficult to achieve the degree of efficiency and reliability that would make fully automated particle selection a useful tool. The simplest methods such as cross correlation (i.e., matched filtering) do not perform well enough to be used for fully automated particle selection. Geometric properties (area, perimeter-to-area ratio, etc.) and the integrated "mass" of candidate particles are additional factors that could improve automated particle selection if suitable methods of contouring particles could be developed. Another suggestion is that data be always collected as pairs of images, the first taken at low defocus (to capture information at the highest possible resolution) and the second at very high defocus (to improve the visibility of the particle). Finally, it is emphasized that well-annotated, open-access data sets need to be established in order to encourage the further development and validation of methods for automated particle selection. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 18
页数:4
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1996, 3 DIMENSIONAL ELECT
[2]   Leginon: An automated system for acquisition of images from vitreous ice specimens [J].
Carragher, B ;
Kisseberth, N ;
Kriegman, D ;
Milligan, RA ;
Potter, CS ;
Pulokas, J ;
Reilein, A .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 2000, 132 (01) :33-45
[3]   Review: Electron crystallography: Present excitement, a nod to the past, anticipating the future [J].
Glaeser, RM .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 1999, 128 (01) :3-14
[4]   Resolution measurement in structures derived from single particles [J].
Grigorieff, N .
ACTA CRYSTALLOGRAPHICA SECTION D-BIOLOGICAL CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, 2000, 56 :1270-1277
[5]   THE POTENTIAL AND LIMITATIONS OF NEUTRONS, ELECTRONS AND X-RAYS FOR ATOMIC-RESOLUTION MICROSCOPY OF UNSTAINED BIOLOGICAL MOLECULES [J].
HENDERSON, R .
QUARTERLY REVIEWS OF BIOPHYSICS, 1995, 28 (02) :171-193
[6]  
LATA KR, 1995, ULTRAMICROSCOPY, V58, P381, DOI 10.1016/0304-3991(95)00002-I
[7]   Review: Automatic particle detection in electron microscopy [J].
Nicholson, WV ;
Glaeser, RM .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 2001, 133 (2-3) :90-101
[8]   Molecular machines: Putting the pieces together [J].
Nogales, E ;
Grigorieff, N .
JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY, 2001, 152 (01) :F1-F10
[9]   Cryo-electron-microscopy reconstruction of partially symmetric objects [J].
Rossmann, MG ;
Tao, YZ .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 1999, 125 (2-3) :196-208
[10]   From words to literature in structural proteomics [J].
Sali, A ;
Glaeser, R ;
Earnest, T ;
Baumeister, W .
NATURE, 2003, 422 (6928) :216-225