A pharmacodynamic model for the time course of tumor shrinkage by gemcitabine plus carboplatin in non-small cell lung cancer patients

被引:50
作者
Tham, Lai-San [1 ]
Wang, Lingzhi [1 ]
Soo, Ross A. [1 ]
Lee, Soo-Chin [1 ]
Lee, How-Sung [2 ]
Yong, Wei-Peng [1 ]
Goh, Boon-Cher [1 ]
Holford, Nicholas H. G. [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Natl Univ Singapore Hosp, Dept Hematol Oncol, Singapore 117548, Singapore
[2] Natl Univ Singapore, Yong Loo Lin Sch Med, Dept Pharmacol, Singapore 117548, Singapore
[3] Univ Auckland, Dept Pharmacol & Clin Pharmacol, Auckland 1, New Zealand
关键词
D O I
10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4754
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
Purpose: This tumor response pharmacodynamic model aims to describe primary lesion shrinkage in non-small cell lung cancer over time and determine if concentration-based exposure metrics for gemcitabine or that of its metabolites, 2',2'-difluorodeoxyuridine or gemcitabine triphosphate, are better than gemcitabine dose for prediction of individual response. Experimental Design: Gemcitabine was given thrice weekly on days 1 and 8 in combination with carboplatin, which was given only on day 1 of every cycle. Gemcitabine amount in the body and area under the concentration-time curves of plasma gemcitabine, 2',2'-difluorodeoxyuridine, and intracellular gemcitabine triphosphate in white cells were compared to determine which best describes tumor shrinkage over time. Tumor growth kinetics were described using a Gompertz-like model. Results: The apparent half-life for the effect of gemcitabine was 7.67 weeks. The tumor turnover time constant was 21.8 week-cm. Baseline tumor size and gemcitabine amount in the body to attain 50% of tumor shrinkage were estimated to be 6.66 cm and 10,600 mg. There was no evidence of relapse during treatment. Conclusions: C oncentrati on-based exposure metrics for gemcitabine and its metabolites were no better than gemcitabine amount in predicting tumor shrinkage in primary lung cancer lesions. Gemcitabine dose-based models did marginally better than treatment-based models that ignored doses of drug administered to patients. Modeling tumor shrinkage in primary lesions can be used to quantify individual sensitivity and response to antitumor effects of anticancer drugs.
引用
收藏
页码:4213 / 4218
页数:6
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]
A PHASE-I CLINICAL, PLASMA, AND CELLULAR PHARMACOLOGY STUDY OF GEMCITABINE [J].
ABBRUZZESE, JL ;
GRUNEWALD, R ;
WEEKS, EA ;
GRAVEL, D ;
ADAMS, T ;
NOWAK, B ;
MINEISHI, S ;
TARASSOFF, P ;
SATTERLEE, W ;
RABER, MN ;
PLUNKETT, W .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1991, 9 (03) :491-498
[2]
A stochastic model in tumor growth [J].
Albano, G. ;
Giorno, V. .
JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 2006, 242 (02) :329-336
[3]
Conceptual frameworks for mathematical modeling of tumor growth dynamics [J].
Bajzer, Z ;
Marusic, M ;
VukPavlovic, S .
MATHEMATICAL AND COMPUTER MODELLING, 1996, 23 (06) :31-46
[4]
Gompertzian growth pattern correlated with phenotypic organization of colon carcinoma, malignant glioma and non-small cell lung carcinoma cell lines [J].
Castro, MAA ;
Klamt, F ;
Grieneisen, VA ;
Grivicich, I ;
Moreira, JCF .
CELL PROLIFERATION, 2003, 36 (02) :65-73
[5]
CLARET L, 2006, ANN M POP APPR GROUP, P15
[6]
Phase III trial of gemcitabine and carboplatin versus mitomycin, ifosfamide, and cisplatin or mitomycin, vinblastine, and cisplatin in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma [J].
Danson, S ;
Middleton, MR ;
O'Byrne, KJ ;
Clemons, M ;
Ranson, M ;
Hassan, J ;
Anderson, H ;
Burt, PA ;
Fairve-Finn, C ;
Stout, R ;
Dowd, I ;
Ashcroft, L ;
Beresford, C ;
Thatcher, N .
CANCER, 2003, 98 (03) :542-553
[7]
Dynamic response of cancer under the influence of immunological activity and therapy [J].
de Vladar, HP ;
González, JA .
JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 2004, 227 (03) :335-348
[8]
Edelman MJ, 2002, LUNG CANCER, V38, pS37
[9]
Radiation concurrent with gemcitabine for locally advanced head and neck cancer: A phase I trial and intracellular drug incorporation study [J].
Eisbruch, A ;
Shewach, DS ;
Bradford, CR ;
Littles, JF ;
Teknos, TN ;
Chepeha, DB ;
Marentette, LJ ;
Terrell, JE ;
Hogikyan, ND ;
Dawson, LA ;
Urba, S ;
Wolf, GT ;
Lawrence, TS .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (03) :792-799
[10]
Mechanistic models for myelosuppression [J].
Friberg, LE ;
Karlsson, MO .
INVESTIGATIONAL NEW DRUGS, 2003, 21 (02) :183-194