Estimating renal function in lupus nephritis: comparison of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease and Cockcroft-Gault equations

被引:24
作者
Kasitanon, N.
Fine, D. M.
Haas, M.
Magder, L. S.
Petri, M.
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Div Rheumatol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Div Nephrol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[4] Univ Maryland, Dept Epidemiol & Prevent Med, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
关键词
Cockcroft-Gault; lupus nephritis; modification of diet in renal disease;
D O I
10.1177/0961203307084167
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Estimates of renal function are widely used in clinical practice and research. We assessed the performance of the Cockcroft-Gault (CG) and the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equations in lupus nephritis patients. Data from ninety-seven lupus nephritis patients in the Hopkins Lupus Cohort were reviewed. Two renal function estimates, the CG and the MDRD, were compared with the 24 h creatinine clearance (CrCl). In the entire group of patients, the CG and MDRD equations had good global agreement with CrCl (R-square = 0.91 and 0.69, respectively). On average the CG equation overestimated CrCl by 2.36 mL/min/1.73 m(2), whereas the MDRD equation underestimated CrCl by 5.85 mL/min/1.73 m(2), P = 0.0004. The CG equation had greater accuracy (mean squared error) than the MDRD equation (14.93 versus 28.47 mL/min/1.73 m(2), P = 0.002) when predicting CrCl. Although both equations lacked precision (standard deviation of the difference scores) in patients with CrCl >= 60 mL/min/ 1.73 m(2), the CG equation was more precise than the MDRD equation in this group, (15.68 versus 29.58 mL/min/1.73m(2), p = 0.003). In lupus nephritis patients, the CG equation was superior to the MDRD equation as an estimate of CrCl. However, both equations lacked precision in patients with CrCl >= 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2).
引用
收藏
页码:887 / 895
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
BRECKENRIDGE A, 1965, LANCET, V2, P265
[2]   IOHEXOL CLEARANCE FOR THE DETERMINATION OF GLOMERULAR-FILTRATION RATE IN CLINICAL-PRACTICE - EVIDENCE FOR A NEW GOLD STANDARD [J].
BROWN, SCW ;
OREILLY, PH .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1991, 146 (03) :675-679
[3]  
Carroll MF, 2000, AM FAM PHYSICIAN, V62, P1333
[4]   ESTIMATION OF GLOMERULAR FILTRATION-RATE FROM PLASMA CLEARANCE OF 51-CHROMIUM EDETIC ACID [J].
CHANTLER, C ;
BARRATT, TM .
ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD, 1972, 47 (254) :613-&
[5]  
CHANTLER C, 1969, CLIN SCI, V37, P169
[6]   PREDICTION OF CREATININE CLEARANCE FROM SERUM CREATININE [J].
COCKCROFT, DW ;
GAULT, MH .
NEPHRON, 1976, 16 (01) :31-41
[7]  
COHEN ML, 1969, PEDIATRICS, V43, P407
[8]   Serum cystatin C is superior to serum creatinine as a marker of kidney function: A meta-analysis [J].
Dharnidharka, VR ;
Kwon, C ;
Stevens, G .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2002, 40 (02) :221-226
[9]   GLOMERULAR FILTRATION-RATE DETERMINED BY CR-51-EDTA-COMPLEX - PRACTICAL METHOD BASED UPON PLASMA DISAPPEARANCE CURVE DETERMINED FROM 4 PLASMA SAMPLES [J].
DITZEL, J ;
BRINKLOV, M ;
VESTERGAARD, P .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 1972, 6 (02) :166-+
[10]   K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: Evaluation, classification, and stratification - Foreword [J].
Eknoyan, G ;
Levin, NW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2002, 39 (02) :S14-S266