Distinct contributions of glutamate and dopamine receptors to temporal aspects of rodent working memory using a clinically relevant task

被引:180
作者
Aultman, JM [1 ]
Moghaddam, B [1 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Med, VA Med Ctr 116A22, Dept Psychiat, West Haven, CT 06516 USA
关键词
prefrontal cortex; D1; receptor; schizophrenia; NMDA receptor;
D O I
10.1007/s002130000590
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Rationale: Understanding the mechanistic basis of working memory, the capacity to hold representation "on line," is important for delineating the processes involved in higher cognitive functions and the pathophysiology of thought disorders. Objectives: We compared the contribution of glutamate and dopamine receptor subtypes to temporal aspects of working memory using a modified rodent spatial working memory task that incorporates important elements of clinical working memory tasks. Methods: A discrete paired-trial variable-delay T-maze task was used. Initial characterization studies indicated that performance on this task is stable at seconds-long retention intervals, is sensitive to retention interval and proactive interference, and is dependent on the integrity of the medial prefrontal cortex. Results: Consistent with clinical findings, low dose amphetamine (0.25 mg/kg) produced a delay-dependent improvement in performance, while higher doses impaired performance at all retention intervals. D1 receptor blockade produced the predicted dose- and delay-dependent impairment. D2 receptor blockade had no effect. Activation of metabotropic glutamate 2/3 (mGluR2/3) receptors, which in the prefrontal cortex inhibits the slow asynchronous phase of glutamate release, also produced a delay-dependent impairment. Low doses of an AMPA/kainate antagonist had effects similar to the mGluR2/3 agonist. In contrast, NMDA receptor antagonist-induced impairment was memory load-insensitive, resulting in chance-level performance at all retention intervals. Conclusions: These findings suggest that activation of NMDA receptors is necessary for the formation of mnemonic encoding while modulatory components involving slow asynchronous release of glutamate and phasic release of dopamine contribute to the active maintenance of information during the delay period.
引用
收藏
页码:353 / 364
页数:12
相关论文
共 98 条
[1]   Corticolimbic dopamine neurotransmission is temporally dissociated from the cognitive and locomotor effects of phencyclidine [J].
Adams, B ;
Moghaddam, B .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 1998, 18 (14) :5545-5554
[2]   Effects of ketamine on thought disorder, working memory, and semantic memory in healthy volunteers [J].
Adler, CM ;
Goldberg, TE ;
Malhotra, AK ;
Pickar, D ;
Breier, A .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 1998, 43 (11) :811-816
[3]  
AGGLETON JP, 1995, J NEUROSCI, V15, P7270
[4]   Serotonin, via 5-HT2A receptors, increases EPSCs in layer V pyramidal cells of prefrontal cortex by an asynchronous mode of glutamate release [J].
Aghajanian, GK ;
Marek, GJ .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 1999, 825 (1-2) :161-171
[5]   An in-depth analysis of lead effects in a delayed spatial alternation task: Assessment of mnemonic effects, side bias, and proactive interference [J].
Alber, SA ;
Strupp, BJ .
NEUROTOXICOLOGY AND TERATOLOGY, 1996, 18 (01) :3-15
[6]   Noise stress impairs prefrontal cortical cognitive function in monkeys - Evidence for a hyperdopaminergic mechanism [J].
Arnsten, AFT ;
Goldman-Rakic, PS .
ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 1998, 55 (04) :362-368
[7]   Catecholamine regulation of the prefrontal cortex [J].
Arnsten, AFT .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1997, 11 (02) :151-162
[8]   DOPAMINE D-1 RECEPTOR MECHANISMS IN THE COGNITIVE PERFORMANCE OF YOUNG-ADULT AND AGED MONKEYS [J].
ARNSTEN, AFT ;
CAI, JX ;
MURPHY, BL ;
GOLDMANRAKIC, PS .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1994, 116 (02) :143-151
[9]   Blockade of NMDA receptors located at the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex impairs spatial working memory in rats [J].
Aura, J ;
Riekkinen, P .
NEUROREPORT, 1999, 10 (02) :243-248
[10]   THE CONCEPT OF WORKING MEMORY - A VIEW OF ITS CURRENT STATE AND PROBABLE FUTURE-DEVELOPMENT [J].
BADDELEY, A .
COGNITION, 1981, 10 (1-3) :17-23