S-fluoxetine in the prophylaxis of migraine: a phase II double-blind randomized placebo-controlled study

被引:61
作者
Steiner, TJ
Ahmed, F
Findley, LJ
MacGregor, EA
Wilkinson, M
机构
[1] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Sch Med, Div Neurosci & Psychol Med, London W6 8RP, England
[2] Oldchurch Hosp, Essex Ctr Neurol Sci, Romford RM7 0BE, Essex, England
[3] City London Migraine Clin, London, England
关键词
enantiomer; fluoxetine; migraine; placebo; randomized controlled trial;
D O I
10.1046/j.1468-2982.1998.1805283.x
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
S-fluoxetine is the long-acting enantiomer of the racemic antidepressant serotonin reuptake inhibitor. Sixty-five patients needing migraine prophylaxis were recruited into a phase II,double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. After a 1-month placebo run-in, 53 patients met entry criteria with regard to attack frequency and were randomized, 27 to S-fluoxetine and 26 to matching placebo. Three failed to start treatment and there were 17 early discontinuations, 9 from S-fluoxetine, 8 from placebo, at similar times and for similar reasons. The primary efficacy variable was attack frequency and analysis compared decline-from-baseline in the two groups. This was earlier and greater (1.7 attacks/28 days, or 52%) on active therapy than on placebo (1.1 attacks/28 days, or 27%), and statistically significant in month 2 (F=4.93; p=0.033) and month 4 (F=4.55; p = 0.041). As secondary measures of efficacy, migraine-days per month and Patient's Global Impression of Disease Severity coherently reflected the changes in attack frequency. Mean attack severity and acute medication use (doses per attack) were unaltered by either treatment. There were no serious adverse events. Withdrawals for adverse events were four from each group but none was considered causally related. The finding of greater efficacy of S-fluoxetine than of placebo should be interpreted conservatively, Since the analysis in the final month was made on only half of the entered patients. It supports progression to phase III evaluation, which was the purpose of the study.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 286
页数:4
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   FLUOXETINE PROPHYLAXIS OF MIGRAINE [J].
ADLY, C ;
STRAUMANIS, J ;
CHESSON, A .
HEADACHE, 1992, 32 (02) :101-104
[2]   CLINICAL-PHARMACOLOGY AND PHARMACOKINETICS OF FLUOXETINE - A REVIEW [J].
BERGSTROM, RF ;
LEMBERGER, L ;
FARID, NA ;
WOLEN, RL .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1988, 153 :47-50
[3]   How do the currently used prophylactic agents work in migraine? [J].
Goadsby, PJ .
CEPHALALGIA, 1997, 17 (02) :85-92
[4]  
*HEAD CLASS COMM I, 1988, CEPHALALGIA S7, V8, P9
[5]   Role of 5-HT1A receptors in the effects of acute and chronic fluoxetine on extracellular serotonin in the frontal cortex [J].
Invernizzi, R ;
Bramante, M ;
Samanin, R .
PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR, 1996, 54 (01) :143-147
[6]  
LANCE JW, 1989, CEPHALALGIA, V9, P7
[8]   Interactions of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors with the serotonin 5-HT2C receptor [J].
Palvimaki, EP ;
Roth, BL ;
Majasuo, H ;
Laakso, A ;
Kuoppamaki, M ;
Syvalahti, E ;
Hietala, J .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1996, 126 (03) :234-240
[9]   DOUBLE-BLIND TRIAL OF FLUOXETINE - CHRONIC DAILY HEADACHE AND MIGRAINE [J].
SAPER, JR ;
SILBERSTEIN, SD ;
LAKE, AE ;
WINTERS, ME .
HEADACHE, 1994, 34 (09) :497-502
[10]   GUIDELINES FOR CONTROLLED TRIALS OF DRUGS IN MIGRAINE .1. EDITION [J].
TFELTHANSEN, P .
CEPHALALGIA, 1991, 11 (01) :1-12