Counting methods are decisive for rankings based on publication and citation studies

被引:77
作者
Gauffriau, M
Larsen, PO
机构
[1] Royal Sch Lib & Informat Sci, Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Aarhus Univ, Steno Inst, Aarhus, Denmark
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s11192-005-0239-6
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
For all rankings Of Countries research output based on number of publications or citations compared with population, GDP, R&D and public R&D expenses, and other national characteristics the counting method is decisive. Total counting (full credit to a country when at least one of the authors is from this country) and Fractional Counting (a country receives a fraction of full credit for a publication equal to the fraction of authors from this country) Of publications give widely different results. Counting methods must be stated, rankings based on different counting methods cannot be compared, and Fractional Counting is to be preferred.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 93
页数:9
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], EUR RES AR KEY FIG 2
[2]  
[Anonymous], SCI ENG IND 2000
[3]  
[Anonymous], SCI TECHN IND SCOR
[4]  
BOURKE P, 1994, CRISIS AUSTR SCI
[5]  
Egghe L, 2000, J AM SOC INFORM SCI, V51, P145, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(2000)51:2<145::AID-ASI6>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-9
[7]  
*EUR COMM, 1997, 2 EUR REP S T IND 19
[8]  
*EUR COMM, 2003, ANN PROGR PAP BENCHM
[9]  
European Commission, 2003, 3 EUR REP SCI TECHN
[10]   National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations [J].
Glänzel, W .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2001, 51 (01) :69-115