Meta-analysis of rizatriptan efficacy in randomized controlled clinical trials

被引:43
作者
Ferrari, MD
Loder, E
McCarroll, KA
Lines, CR
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Neurol, Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Spalding Rehabil Hosp, Headache Management Program, Boston, MA USA
[3] Merck & Co Inc, West Point, PA USA
关键词
rizatriptan; 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonist; migraine;
D O I
10.1046/j.1468-2982.2001.00169.x
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Data from seven randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase III clinical trials were analysed to further evaluate the efficacy of rizatriptan 10 mg (n=2068) in comparison with placebo (n=1260) and rizatriptan 5 mg (n=1486) for the acute treatment of a migraine attack. Migraine was diagnosed according to International Headache Society criteria. Headache severity, associated migraine symptoms and functional disability were measured immediately before dosing and at 0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2 h. Headache recurrence (return of moderate or severe headache after an initial response) was also recorded. In addition to conventional pain relief (reduction of moderate or severe headache to mild or none) and pain free measures, the analysis looked at the elimination of associated migraine symptoms and disability in patients who had symptoms or disability at baseline. Maintenance of pain relief or pain-free status over 23 h was also analysed. At 2 h, rizatriptan 10 mg was significantly more effective than placebo for pain relief (71% vs. 38%, P<0.001), and for elimination of pain, nausea, photophobia, phonophobia and functional disability. The benefit was maintained over 24 h; 37% of patients on rizatriptan 10 mg had sustained pain relief vs. 18% for placebo (P<0.001). Rizatriptan 10 mg was also more effective than rizatriptan 5 mg, with a significant superiority at 2h on all measures except for elimination of nausea. The benefit was maintained over 24 h; 38% of patients on rizatriptan 10 mg had sustained pain relief vs. 32% for rizatriptan 5 mg (P=0.001).
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 136
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Efficacy and safety of rizatriptan wafer for the acute treatment of migraine [J].
Ahrens, SP ;
Farmer, MV ;
Williams, DL ;
Willoughby, E ;
Jiang, K ;
Block, GA ;
Visser, WH .
CEPHALALGIA, 1999, 19 (05) :525-530
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1991, Cephalalgia, V11, P1
[3]   Efficacy and safety of rizatriptan versus standard care during long-term treatment for migraine [J].
Block, GA ;
Goldstein, J ;
Polis, A ;
Reines, SA ;
Smith, ME .
HEADACHE, 1998, 38 (10) :764-771
[4]   Comparison of rizatriptan 10 mg vs. naratriptan 2.5 mg in migraine [J].
Bomhof, M ;
Paz, J ;
Legg, N ;
Allen, C ;
Vandormael, K ;
Patel, K .
EUROPEAN NEUROLOGY, 1999, 42 (03) :173-179
[5]  
Dahlof C, 1999, Expert Opin Investig Drugs, V8, P671, DOI 10.1517/13543784.8.5.671
[6]   How to assess and compare drugs in the management of migraine: success rates in terms of response and recurrence [J].
Ferrari, M .
CEPHALALGIA, 1999, 19 :2-8
[7]   Migraine [J].
Ferrari, MD .
LANCET, 1998, 351 (9108) :1043-1051
[8]   Double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding study of rizatriptan (MK-462) in the acute treatment of migraine [J].
Gijsman, H ;
Kramer, MS ;
Sargent, J ;
Tuchman, M ;
MatzuraWolfe, D ;
Polis, A ;
Teall, J ;
Block, G ;
Ferrari, MD .
CEPHALALGIA, 1997, 17 (06) :647-651
[9]  
*GLAX WELLC INC, 1999, PHYS DESK REF, P1141
[10]   Efficacy definitions for migraine studies [J].
Goldstein, DJ ;
Offen, WW ;
Moster, MB .
CEPHALALGIA, 1999, 19 (04) :248-249