Reforming research ethics committees - Latest proposals are a missed opportunity for a radical review

被引：18

作者：

Ashcroft, RE ^{[1
]}

Newson, AJ ^{[1
]}

Benn, PMW ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Dept Primary Care & Social Med, Med Eth Unit, London W6 8RP, England

来源：

BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2005年 / 331卷 / 7517期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1136/bmj.331.7517.587

中图分类号：

R5 [内科学];

学科分类号：

1002 ; 100201 ;

摘要：

引用

页码：587 / 588

页数：2

共 11 条

[1]

[Anonymous], 2001, RES GOV FRAM HLTH SO

[2]

[Anonymous], 2004, U RES ETHICS COMMITT

[3]

Baeyens A J, 2004, Med Law, V23, P103

[4]

*DEP HLTH, 1991, HSG915 DOH

[5]

*DEP HLTH, 2005, REP AD HOC ADV GROUP

[6]

*DEP HLTH, 1997, HSG9723 DOH

[7]

*EC SOC RES COUNC, ESRC ANN NEW RES ETH

[8] Research ethics committees: Differences and moral judgement [J].

Edwards, SJL ;

Ashcroft, R ;

Kirchin, S .

BIOETHICS, 2004, 18 (05) :408-427

[9] Comparison of requirements of research ethics committees in 11 European countires for a non-invasive interventional study [J].

Hearnshaw, H .

BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 328 (7432) :140-141

[10] The practice of obtaining approval from medical research ethics committees:: a comparison within 12 European countries for a descriptive study on acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in Alzheimer's dementia [J].

Rikkert, MGMO ;

Lauque, S ;

Frölich, L ;

Vellas, B ;

Dekkers, W .

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2005, 12 (03) :212-217

← 1 2 →