The controls on net ecosystem productivity along an Arctic transect: a model comparison with flux measurements

被引:80
作者
Williams, M [1 ]
Eugster, W
Rastetter, EB
McFadden, JP
Chapin, FS
机构
[1] Marine Biol Lab, Ctr Ecosyst, Woods Hole, MA 02543 USA
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Integrat Biol, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
Arctic tundra; ecosystem model; productivity; respiration;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2486.2000.06016.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Assessments of carbon (C) fluxes in the Arctic require detailed data on both how and why these fluxes vary across the landscape. Such assessments are complicated because tundra vegetation has diverse structure and function at both local and regional stales. To investigate this diversity, the Arctic Flux Study has used the eddy covariance technique to generate ecosystem CO2-exchange data along a transect in northern Alaska. We use an extant process-based model of the soil-plant-atmosphere continuum to make independent predictions of grass photosynthesis and foliar respiration at 9 of the sites along the transect, using data on local canopy structure and meteorology. We make two key assumptions: (i) soil respiration is constant throughout the flux measurement period, so that the diurnal cycle in CO2 exchange is driven by canopy processes only (except at two sites where a soil respiration-temperature relationship was indicated in the data); and (ii) mosses and lichens play an insignificant role in ecosystem C exchange, even though in some locations their live biomass exceeds 300 g m(-2). We found that even with these assumptions the model could explain much of the dynamics of net ecosystem production (NEP) at sites with widely differing vegetation structure and moss/lichen cover. Errors were mostly associated with the predictions of maximum NEP; the likely cause of such discrepancies was (i) a mismatch between vegetation sampled for characterizing the canopy structure and that contained within the footprint of the eddy covariance flux measurements, or (ii) an increase in daytime soil and root respiration. Thus the model results tended to falsify our first assumption but not our second. We also note evidence for an actual reduction in NEP caused by water stress on warm, dry days at some sites, The model-flux comparison also suggests that photosynthesis may be less sensitive to low temperatures than leaf-level gas-exchange measurements have indicated.
引用
收藏
页码:116 / 126
页数:11
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1992, Arctic ecosystems in a changing climate
  • [2] Bliss LC., 1992, ARCTIC ECOSYSTEMS CH, P59, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-168250-7.50010-9
  • [3] RESPONSES OF ARCTIC TUNDRA TO EXPERIMENTAL AND OBSERVED CHANGES IN CLIMATE
    CHAPIN, FS
    SHAVER, GR
    GIBLIN, AE
    NADELHOFFER, KJ
    LAUNDRE, JA
    [J]. ECOLOGY, 1995, 76 (03) : 694 - 711
  • [4] Physiological and growth responses of arctic plants to a field experiment simulating climatic change
    Chapin, FS
    Shaver, GR
    [J]. ECOLOGY, 1996, 77 (03) : 822 - 840
  • [5] A COSPECTRAL CORRECTION MODEL FOR MEASUREMENT OF TURBULENT NO2 FLUX
    EUGSTER, W
    SENN, W
    [J]. BOUNDARY-LAYER METEOROLOGY, 1995, 74 (04) : 321 - 340
  • [6] A comparative approach to regional variation in surface fluxes using mobile eddy correlation towers
    Eugster, W
    Mcfadden, JP
    Chapin, ES
    [J]. BOUNDARY-LAYER METEOROLOGY, 1997, 85 (02) : 293 - 307
  • [7] Farquhar G. D., 1982, Encyclopedia of plant physiology. New series. Volume 12B. Physiological plant ecology. II. Water relations and carbon assimilation. [Lange, O.L.
  • [8] Nobel, P.S.
  • [9] Osmond, C.B.
  • [10] Ziegler, H. (Editors)], P549