Assessment and treatment of destructive behavior maintained by stereotypic object manipulation

被引:42
作者
Fisher, WW
Lindauer, SE
Alterson, CJ
Thompson, RH
机构
[1] Kennedy Krieger Inst, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
automatic reinforcement; functional analysis; property destruction; stereotypy;
D O I
10.1901/jaba.1998.31-513
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
In the current investigation, 2 participants with mental retardation displayed property destruction and stereotypy, and both responses involved the same materials (e.g., breaking and tapping plastic objects). Three experiments were conducted (a) to indirectly assess the functions of these two responses, (b) to determine their relation to one another, and (c) to develop a treatment to reduce the more serious behavior, property destruction. In Experiment 1, previously destroyed materials were either present or absent, and their presence reduced property destruction but not stereotypy In Experiment 2, matched toys (ones that produced sensory stimulation similar to stereotypy) were either present or absent, or were replaced by unmatched toys (for 1 participant). Matched toys produced large reductions and unmatched toys produced small reductions in property destruction and stereotypy In Experiment 3, attempts to pick up undestroyed objects were either blocked or not blocked while matched toys were continuously available. Response blocking reduced property destruction (and attempts), prevented stereotypy, and increased manipulation of-matched toys. These results suggest that the two aberrant responses formed a chain (e.g., breaking and then tapping the object), which was maintained by the sensory consequences (e.g., auditory stimulation) of the terminal response, and that previously destroyed material or matched toys made the initial response (property destruction) unnecessary.
引用
收藏
页码:513 / 527
页数:15
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
AMAN MG, 1985, AM J MENT DEF, V89, P485
[2]   On the relation of mands and the function of destructive behavior [J].
Bowman, LG ;
Fisher, WW ;
Thompson, RH ;
Piazza, CC .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 1997, 30 (02) :251-265
[3]   USING ABERRANT BEHAVIORS AS REINFORCERS FOR AUTISTIC-CHILDREN [J].
CHARLOP, MH ;
KURTZ, PF ;
CASEY, FG .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 1990, 23 (02) :163-181
[4]   2 MEASURES OF PREFERENCE DURING FORCED-CHOICE ASSESSMENTS [J].
DERBY, KM ;
WACKER, DP ;
ANDELMAN, M ;
BERG, W ;
DREW, J ;
ASMUS, J ;
PROUTY, AM ;
LAFFEY, P .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 1995, 28 (03) :345-346
[5]  
DERBY KM, 1996, J APPL BEHAV ANAL, V29, P101
[6]   TREATMENT OF SELF-INJURY BY PROVIDING ALTERNATE SENSORY ACTIVITIES [J].
FAVELL, JE ;
MCGIMSEY, JF ;
SCHELL, RM .
ANALYSIS AND INTERVENTION IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, 1982, 2 (01) :83-104
[7]   A COMPARISON OF 2 APPROACHES FOR IDENTIFYING REINFORCERS FOR PERSONS WITH SEVERE AND PROFOUND DISABILITIES [J].
FISHER, W ;
PIAZZA, CC ;
BOWMAN, LG ;
HAGOPIAN, LP ;
OWENS, JC ;
SLEVIN, I .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 1992, 25 (02) :491-498
[8]   Further analysis of the relationship between self-injury and self-restraint [J].
Fisher, WW ;
Grace, NC ;
Murphy, C .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 1996, 29 (01) :103-106
[9]   Functional analysis and treatment of destructive behavior maintained by termination of "don't" (and symmetrical "do") requests [J].
Fisher, WW ;
Adelinis, JD ;
Thompson, RH ;
Worsdell, AS ;
Zarcone, JR .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 1998, 31 (03) :339-356
[10]  
Fisher WW, 1996, AM J MENT RETARD, V101, P15