Time use, gender, and public policy regimes

被引:115
作者
Gershuny, J [1 ]
Sullivan, O
机构
[1] Univ Essex, Inst Social & Econ, Colchester CO4 3SQ, Essex, England
[2] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Dept Behav Sci, IL-84105 Beer Sheva, Israel
来源
SOCIAL POLITICS | 2003年 / 10卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.1093/sp/jxg012
中图分类号
D58 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
摘要
A number of general features of interest in a social policy context emerge from the evidence for changes in patterns of time use. The question that we address here is: is it possible to specify public policy regime effects on Patterns of time use? Some hypotheses are advanced concerning likely patterns of relationship between the liberal and social-democratic public policy regimes and the use of time in these societies. The data used are drawn from a multinational time-use data archive held at the Institute for Social and Economic Research at the University of Essex. A clear relationship is found between public policy regime and paid work time (those in liberal market regimes work longer on average), however, there are no consistent regime effects found either for the amount of time spent in different leisure activities or in respect of the domestic division of labor. The conclusion is that, at least in relation to the time-use variables used in the these analyses, the gender division of domestic labor and type of leisure activity represent different dimensions of variability than those commonly used in the classification of public policy regimes.
引用
收藏
页码:205 / 228
页数:24
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
AHLBURG DA, 1992, POPULATION B, V47, P26
[2]  
[Anonymous], SOCIAL POLITICAL EC
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1967, THEORY LEISURE CLASS
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1997, The Second Shift
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1999, SOCIAL FDN POSTINDUS, DOI DOI 10.1093/0198742002.001.0001
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1991, WOMEN CONTINENTS FEM
[7]   Relational resources, gender consciousness and possibilities of change in marital relationships [J].
Benjamin, O ;
Sullivan, O .
SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1999, 47 (04) :794-820
[8]  
Berk SarahFenstermaker., 1985, THE GENDER FACTORY
[9]  
Bourdieu P., 1979, Science of Science and Reflexivity
[10]  
Clark C., 1957, CONDITIONS EC PROGR