Reproducibility of ultrasound measurement of the abdominal aorta

被引:100
作者
Beales, L.
Wolstenhulme, S. [2 ]
Evans, J. A. [3 ]
West, R. [4 ]
Scott, D. J. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, LIGHT Labs, Div Cardiovasc & Diabet Res, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Leeds, Sch Healthcare, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[3] Univ Leeds, Div Med Phys, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[4] Univ Leeds, Ctr Epidemiol & Biostat, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; INTEROBSERVER VARIABILITY; ANEURYSM; MORTALITY; SURVEILLANCE; STATEMENT; ACCURACY; DIAMETER; DISEASE; MEN;
D O I
10.1002/bjs.7628
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
100210 [外科学];
摘要
Background: Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening and surveillance programmes use ultrasound imaging to measure the anteroposterior (AP) diameter of the infrarenal aorta. The aim of this study was to examine potential observer bias and variability in ultrasound measurements. Methods: Studies were identified for review via a MEDLINE database search (1966-2009). References supplied in accessed papers were also checked for potential relevance. Consistent search terminology, and inclusion and exclusion criteria were used to ensure quality of data. Nine papers were available to review. Results: Variation in intraobserver repeatability and interobserver reproducibility was identified. Six studies reported intraobserver repeatability coefficients for AP aortic diameter measurements of 1.6-4.4 mm. These were below the 5-mm level regarded as acceptable by the UK and USA AAA screening programmes. Five studies had interobserver reproducibility below the level of 5 mm. Four studies, however, reported poor reproducibility (range from -2 to +5.2 to -10.5 to +10.4); these differences may have had a significant clinical impact on screening and surveillance. Conclusion: The studies used different methodologies with no standardized measurement techniques. Measurements were taken by observers from different medical disciplines of varying grade and levels of training. Standard training and formal quality assurance of ultrasound measurements are important components of an effective AAA screening programme.
引用
收藏
页码:1517 / 1525
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]
ACCURACY OF ULTRASONOGRAPHIC MEASUREMENT OF INFRARENAL ABDOMINAL AORTIC-ANEURYSM [J].
AKKERSDIJK, GJM ;
PUYLAERT, JBCM ;
COERKAMP, EG ;
DEVRIES, AC .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1994, 81 (03) :376-376
[2]
Ashton H, 2007, BRIT J SURG, V94, P653
[3]
The Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS) into the effect of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening on mortality in men: a randomised controlled trial [J].
Ashton, HA ;
Buxton, MJ ;
Day, NE ;
Kim, LG ;
Marteau, TM ;
Scott, RAP ;
Thomspon, SG ;
Walker, NM .
LANCET, 2002, 360 (9345) :1531-1539
[4]
Bland M. J., 1986, LANCET, V327, P307, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8
[5]
Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: Recommendation statement [J].
Calonge, N ;
Allan, JD ;
Berg, AO ;
Frame, PS ;
Gordis, L ;
Gregory, KD ;
Harris, R ;
Johnson, MS ;
Klein, JD ;
Loveland-Cherry, C ;
Moyer, VA ;
Ockene, JK ;
Petitti, DB ;
Siu, AL ;
Teutsch, SM ;
Yawn, BP .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2005, 142 (03) :198-202
[6]
CAMPBELL MJ, 2007, WALTERS MED STAT TXB
[7]
Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (Review) [J].
Cosford, P. A. ;
Leng, G. C. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2007, (02)
[8]
A single normal ultrasonographic scan at age 65 years rules out significant aneurysm disease for life in men [J].
Crow, P ;
Shaw, E ;
Earnshaw, JJ ;
Poskitt, KR ;
Whyman, MR ;
Heather, BP .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2001, 88 (07) :941-944
[9]
Ehlers L, 2009, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V338, P2243
[10]
LIMITATIONS OF ULTRASONOGRAPHY IN SURVEILLANCE OF SMALL ABDOMINAL AORTIC-ANEURYSMS [J].
ELLIS, M ;
POWELL, JT ;
GREENHALGH, RM .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1991, 78 (05) :614-616