Hardness testing on advanced technical ceramics

被引:32
作者
Ullner, C
Germak, A
Le Doussal, H
Morrell, R
Reich, T
Vandermeulen, W
机构
[1] Bundesanstalt Materialforsch & Prufung, BAM, Head Lab, D-12200 Berlin, Germany
[2] Inst Metrol G Colonnetti, Turin, Italy
[3] Soc Francaise Ceram, Paris, France
[4] Natl Phys Lab, Teddington TW11 0LW, Middx, England
[5] Fraunhofer Inst Keram Technologien & Sinterwerkst, Dresden, Germany
[6] Vlaamse Instelling Technol Onderzoek, B-2400 Mol, Belgium
关键词
Al2O3; hardness; standards; SiC; Si3N4; testing;
D O I
10.1016/S0955-2219(00)00214-4
中图分类号
TQ174 [陶瓷工业]; TB3 [工程材料学];
学科分类号
0805 ; 080502 ;
摘要
To validate the European standard ENV 843-4 for hardness measurements on ceramics, three classes of ceramic materials, silicon nitride, silicon carbide, and aluminium oxide: involving 19 ceramics in total, were tested using the traditional techniques Vickers (HV1), Knoop (HK2), and superficial Rockwell (HR45N). The use of new ceramic reference blocks certified according to the standards ISO 4547 and ISO 6507-1 for metallic materials was studied. If the hardness response of the tested materials does not involve chipping and cracking the application of high hardness reference blocks for training users to obtain hardness values comparable with the certified HV1 and HK2 values improves the reproducibility from about 10% to 1 to 3%. The scatter between the laboratories is similar to the scatter within the laboratories. The measurement of the indentation geometry on typical commercial ceramic materials call be made only with higher scatter and reduced reproducibility compared with typical metallic materials, which is caused by the stochastic indentation response. For such materials involving chipping and cracking (for instance SiC), the application of reference blocks with well-shaped indentations does not provide improved comparability of results between the laboratories, The actual indentation response of the ceramic material tested must be considered before selecting the appropriate hardness technique and test force. There is no significant difference between the abilities of the hardness techniques HV1, HK2, and HR45N to discriminate sensitively between materials of closely similar properties. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:439 / 451
页数:13
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1997, 65071 ISO
[2]  
[Anonymous], C132696A ASTM
[3]  
*ASTM, C132796A ASTM
[4]  
BUTTERFIELD DM, 1989, 685 NPL DMA
[5]   HARDNESS TESTING OF CERAMIC MATERIALS [J].
CLINTON, DJ ;
MORRELL, R .
MATERIALS CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 1987, 17 (05) :461-473
[6]  
GETTINGS R, 1995, HARDNESS STANDARD RE, V1194, P225
[7]   Examination of the indentation size effect in low-load Vickers hardness testing of ceramics [J].
Gong, JH ;
Wu, JJ ;
Guan, ZD .
JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN CERAMIC SOCIETY, 1999, 19 (15) :2625-2631
[8]  
*ISO CD, 1997, 14705 ISOCD
[9]  
Polzin T., 1997, Praktische Metallographie, V34, P488
[10]  
Polzin T, 1998, MATERIALPRUFUNG, V40, P424