Justice motive theory and the study of justice in work organizations: A conceptual integration

被引:12
作者
Bobocel, D. Ramona [1 ]
Hafer, Carolyn L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Waterloo, Dept Psychol, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
[2] Brock Univ, St Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, Canada
关键词
justice motive theory; organizational fairness; organizational justice; deservingness; BELIEF;
D O I
10.1027/1016-9040.12.4.283
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Stimulated by the articles in this special issue, we integrate justice motive theory into the study of organizational justice more broadly. We begin by considering a variety of ways that just-world beliefs could relate to perceptions of organizational fairness. Then, we discuss several implications that arise from incorporating the concept of deservingness (central to justice motive theory) more explicitly into the study of organizational justice. Next, we consider, from a justice motive perspective, how organizational fairness might have adverse effects on employees and organizations. Finally, we outline what justice motive theory implies for understanding how employees might react to experiences of organizational unfairness. Along the way, we identify novel directions for research on organizational justice that are suggested by the articles in the special issue and by justice motive theory in general.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 289
页数:7
相关论文
共 58 条
  • [1] ADAMS JS, 1965, ADV EXP SOC PSYCHOL, V2, P267
  • [2] Effects of mobbing on justice beliefs and adjustment
    Adoric, Vera Cubela
    Kvartuc, Tina
    [J]. EUROPEAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2007, 12 (04) : 261 - 271
  • [3] Ambrose ML, 2005, HANDBOOK OF ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE, P59
  • [4] [Anonymous], RES SOCIAL ISSUES MA
  • [5] BLADER SL, 2005, RES SOCIAL ISSUES MA, V4, P3
  • [6] Bobocel DR, 2005, HANDBOOK OF ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE, P469
  • [7] Brockner J, 2005, HANDBOOK OF ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE, P525
  • [8] An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: Interactive effects of outcomes and procedures
    Brockner, J
    Wiesenfeld, BM
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1996, 120 (02) : 189 - 208
  • [9] High procedural fairness heightens the effect of outcome favorability on self-evaluations: An attributional analysis
    Brockner, J
    Heuer, L
    Magner, N
    Folger, R
    Umphress, E
    van den Bos, K
    Vermunt, R
    Magner, M
    Siegel, P
    [J]. ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2003, 91 (01) : 51 - 68
  • [10] CALLAN MJ, IN PRESS SOCIAL JUST