Stochastic bilevel programming in structural optimization

被引:65
作者
Christiansen, S [1 ]
Patriksson, M
Wynter, L
机构
[1] Ecole Polytech, Palaiseau, France
[2] Chalmers Univ Technol, Dept Math, S-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden
[3] Univ Versailles, PRISM, F-78000 Versailles, France
关键词
topology optimization; mathematical program with equilibrium constraints (MPEC); contact conditions; average-case analysis; parallel algorithm;
D O I
10.1007/s001580100115
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
We consider the mathematical modelling and solution of robust and cost-optimizing structural (topology) design problems. The setting is the optimal design of a linear-elastic structure, for example a truss topology, under unilateral frictionless contact, and under uncertainty in the data describing the load conditions, the material properties, and the rigid foundation. The resulting stochastic bilevel optimization model finds a structural design that responds the best to the given probability distribution in the data. This model is of special interest when a structural failure will lead to a reconstruction cost, rather than loss of life. For the mathematical model, we provide results on the existence of optimal solutions which allow for zero lower design bounds. We establish that the optimal solution is continuous in the lower design bounds, a result which validates the use of small but positive values of them, and for such bounds we also establish the locally Lipschitz continuity and directional differentiability of the implicit upper-level objective function. We also provide a heuristic algorithm for the solution of the problem, which makes use of its differentiability properties and parallelization strategies across the scenarios. A small set of numerical experiments illustrates the behaviour of the stochastic solution compared to all average-case deterministic one, establishing ail increased robustness.
引用
收藏
页码:361 / 371
页数:11
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Multiple-load truss topology and sizing optimization: Some properties of minimax compliance [J].
Achtziger, W .
JOURNAL OF OPTIMIZATION THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 1998, 98 (02) :255-280
[2]  
Aubin J. P., 1990, Set-valued analysis, DOI 10.1007/978-0-8176-4848-0
[3]   Robust truss topology design via semidefinite programming [J].
Ben-Tal, A ;
Nemirovski, A .
SIAM JOURNAL ON OPTIMIZATION, 1997, 7 (04) :991-1016
[4]  
Bendsoe MP., 1995, OPTIMIZATION STRUCTU, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-03115-5
[5]  
BRANDT A, 1984, ENG T, V32, P57
[6]  
Eaves B. C., 1971, Management Science, V17, P698, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.17.11.698
[7]  
Frank M., 1956, Naval research logistics quarterly, V3, P95, DOI 10.1002/nav.3800030109
[8]   SHAPE OPTIMIZATION IN UNILATERAL CONTACT PROBLEMS USING GENERALIZED RECIPROCAL ENERGY AS OBJECTIVE FUNCTIONAL [J].
HASLINGER, J ;
KLARBRING, A .
NONLINEAR ANALYSIS-THEORY METHODS & APPLICATIONS, 1993, 21 (11) :815-834
[9]  
Haslinger J, 1996, FINITE ELEMENT APPRO
[10]  
Hilding D., 1999, Appl Mech Rev, V52, P139, DOI [10.1115/1.3098931, DOI 10.1115/1.3098931]