Explaining regulatory non-compliance: A survey study of rule transgression for two Dutch instrumental laws, applying the randomized response method

被引:38
作者
Elffers, H
van der Heijden, P
Hezemans, M
机构
[1] NSCR, Netherlands Inst Study Crime & Law Enforcement, NL-2300 AT Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, Fac Social Sci, Dept Methodol & Stat, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Nederlandsche Bank DNB, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
regulatory non-compliance; randomized response; table-of-eleven; rational choice;
D O I
10.1023/B:JOQC.0000005442.96987.9e
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Within a rational choice framework, secondary data analysis of a survey study on compliance with two Dutch regulatory laws is carried out. Selection of explanatory variables to be considered is guided by a heuristic device, called the "Table-of-Eleven.'' Using adapted logistic regression analysis, we show that self-reported compliance, measured by means of a randomized response procedure, can be explained in terms of benefits of non-compliance, social norms and deterrence, while knowledge and general norm-conformity have no role to play. The impact of various contributing factors turns out to be rather different in size for the two laws.
引用
收藏
页码:409 / 439
页数:31
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
Andreoni J, 1998, J ECON LIT, V36, P818
[2]  
[Anonymous], BELEIDSANALYSE
[3]  
[Anonymous], TAXPAYER COMPLIANCE
[4]   CRIME AND PUNISHMENT - ECONOMIC APPROACH [J].
BECKER, GS .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1968, 76 (02) :169-217
[5]   BEYOND DETERRENCE - BEHAVIORAL DECISION-THEORY AND TAX COMPLIANCE [J].
CASEY, JT ;
SCHOLZ, JT .
LAW & SOCIETY REVIEW, 1991, 25 (04) :821-843
[6]  
Chaudhuri A., 1988, Randomized response: Theory and techniques
[7]  
ELFFERS H., 1991, INCOME TAX EVASION T
[8]  
ELFFERS H, 2000, TAFEL ELF, P79
[9]  
ELFFERS H, 2001, ENV WELLBEING, P62
[10]  
ELFFERS H, 1997, 1997 STOCKH C EUR EV