Environmental assessment of two waste incineration strategies for central Norway

被引:24
作者
Bergsdal, H [1 ]
Stromman, AH
Hertwich, EG
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Energy & Proc Engn, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway
[2] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Ind Ecol Programme, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway
关键词
LCA case studies; Norway; systems LCA; technology scenarios; waste incineration;
D O I
10.1065/lca2005.04.204
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Background, Aims and Scope. A strategy of local incineration with 17 small incinerators (Scenario L) is compared to a strategy of 3 centralized waste incinerators (Scenario Q for the region of Central Norway, in order to assess differences in environmental performance. Rough calculations of costs are also included. The functional unit is the treatment of municipal, commercial and special waste not recycled, plus the heating of a specific number of households, for the period of 2002 to 2020. Methods. Data on large and small scale incinerators were obtained from technology providers. LCA databases were used for transportation and heating, while cost estimates and Norwegian input-output tables were used for the construction of the facilities. The CML2 method was used to evaluate the impacts. Results and Discussion. Transportation is a major contributor to aquatic toxicity and acidification as well as CO2 emissions. Impacts from construction are considerable for photochemical oxidation, while incineration is important for terrestrial toxicity and CO2 emissions. Conclusion. Construction and operation of treatment facilities are, together with transportation, the main processes making a difference between the two strategies. Substantial gains will come from the reduction in transportation need when introducing a local incineration strategy. When considering a time span of two decades, the centralized scenario is about 2.5 to 5 times the impact potential of the local scenario for most impact categories, in terms of cumulative results. Cost estimates for the two solutions support these findings, as cumulated costs also favors a local solution. Recommendation and Outlook. Transportation is a major contributor to several impact categories, and especially the transportation of special waste should become more efficient in terms of transportation distances. Cost estimates support the environmental assessment, but a more comprehensive economic study of the system would be valuable.
引用
收藏
页码:263 / 272
页数:10
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
*ENV ARC, 2002, TECHN DESCR TECHN RE
[2]  
GOINEE JB, 2002, ECOEFFICIENCY IND SC, V7
[3]  
Kuemmel B., 1997, LIFE CYCLE ANAL ENER
[4]   ENVIRONMENTAL REPERCUSSIONS AND ECONOMIC STRUCTURE - INPUT-OUTPUT APPROACH [J].
LEONTIEF, W .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1970, 52 (03) :262-271
[5]  
Leontief W.W., 1966, INPUT OUTPUT EC
[6]  
Miller R., 2009, Input -Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions, DOI [10.1017/cbo9780511626982, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511626982]
[7]  
*MIN ENV, 2000, GOV ENV POL ENV STAT
[8]  
*MIN PETR EN, 1998, EN BAL 2020 TECHN RE
[9]  
*NORW DEP TRANSP, 2002, ROUT PLANN TECHN REP
[10]  
*NORW POLL CONTR A, 2000, EST POT INT WAST SEC