Divergent stakeholder theory - Response

[1] [Anonymous], 1966, Philosophy of Social Science

[2] [Anonymous], 1988, MORALITY LIMITS REAS

[3] THE STAKEHOLDER THEORY OF THE CORPORATION - CONCEPTS, EVIDENCE, AND IMPLICATIONS [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1995, 20 (01) : 65 - 91

[4] DONALDSON T, 1994, BUSINESS ETHICS Q, V2, P157

[5] ELGIN CZ, 1998, REFLECTIVE EQUILIBRI

[6] Feyerabend, 1975, METHOD OUTLINE ANARC

[7] Freeman E., 1984, Stakeholder Management: A Stakeholder Approach, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139192675

[8] Freeman R.E., 1988, CORPORATE STRATEGY S

[9] Freeman R.E., 1994, Business Ethics Quarterly, V4, P409

[10] Goodman N., 1955, FACT FICTION FORECAS

[1] [Anonymous], 1966, Philosophy of Social Science

[2] [Anonymous], 1988, MORALITY LIMITS REAS

[3] THE STAKEHOLDER THEORY OF THE CORPORATION - CONCEPTS, EVIDENCE, AND IMPLICATIONS [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1995, 20 (01) : 65 - 91

[4] DONALDSON T, 1994, BUSINESS ETHICS Q, V2, P157

[5] ELGIN CZ, 1998, REFLECTIVE EQUILIBRI

[6] Feyerabend, 1975, METHOD OUTLINE ANARC

[7] Freeman E., 1984, Stakeholder Management: A Stakeholder Approach, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139192675

[8] Freeman R.E., 1988, CORPORATE STRATEGY S

[9] Freeman R.E., 1994, Business Ethics Quarterly, V4, P409

[10] Goodman N., 1955, FACT FICTION FORECAS