A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of a far infrared-emitting sericite belt in patients with primary dysmenorrhea

被引:44
作者
Lee, Chae Hyeong [1 ]
Roh, Ju-Won [1 ]
Lim, Chi-Yeon [2 ]
Hong, Jin Hwa [3 ]
Lee, Jae Kwan [3 ]
Min, Eung Gi [1 ]
机构
[1] Dongguk Univ, Coll Med, Ilsan Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Goyang 410773, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
[2] Dongguk Univ, Grad Sch, Dept Med, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Korea Univ, Coll Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Seoul 136705, South Korea
关键词
Far infrared ray; Primary dysmenorrhea; Randomized controlled trial; Sericite belt; REPEATED THERMAL THERAPY; HEART-FAILURE; TOPICAL HEAT; LOW-LEVEL; THICKNESS; RATS; PAIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ctim.2011.06.004
中图分类号
R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
100218 [急诊医学];
摘要
Objective: To determine the efficacy and safety of a sericite which emits far infrared rays in the management of primary dysmenorrhea. Design: A multicenter randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Setting: One hundred four patients with primary dysmenorrhea were randomized to wear a sericite or placebo belt during sleep for 3 menstrual cycles, and followed for 2 menstrual cycles. Hot packs were used to heat the ceramics and ensure slight pain relief in both groups. Main outcome measures: The main outcome measures were the severity of dysmenorrhea assessed by a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS) and the number of patients who took analgesics at each menstrual cycle. Safety was evaluated by physical examination and self-reporting of adverse events. Results: The baseline VAS scores were 7.27 +/- 0.19 in the experimental group and 7.38 +/- 0.19 in the control group. The severity of dysmenorrhea gradually decreased during the treatment period in both groups, with major improvements observed in the third treatment cycle (4.96 +/- 0.30 in the experimental group and 5.69 +/- 0.30 in the control group, p=0.087). During the follow-up period, the decreased VAS score was maintained in the experimental group, whereas the VAS score gradually returned to baseline in the control group, which resulted in significant difference between the groups (5.08 +/- 0.31 vs. 6.47 +/- 0.31 at cycle 5, difference -1.39 [95% CI, -2.25 to -0.53], p = 0.0017). The number of patients who took analgesics decreased in both groups, but the differences were not statistically significant. No serious adverse events related to wearing the sericite belt occurred. Conclusions: Our data suggest that a far infrared-emitting sericite belt with a hot pack might be used as an effective and safe non-pharmacologic treatment option for women with primary dysmenorrhea, with a prolonged effect after treatment. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:187 / 193
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]
Akin M, 2004, J REPROD MED, V49, P739
[2]
Continuous low-level topical heat in the treatment of dysmenorrhea [J].
Akin, MD ;
Weingand, KW ;
Hengehold, DA ;
Goodale, MB ;
Hinkle, RT ;
Smith, RP .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 97 (03) :343-349
[3]
Cutaneous Lymphoid Hyperplasia (Pseudolymphoma) in a Tattoo After Far Infrared Light [J].
Chiang, Charles ;
Romero, Laura .
DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, 2009, 35 (09) :1434-1438
[4]
The application of nanosized silver colloids in far infrared low-emissive coating [J].
Chou, Kan-Sen ;
Lu, Yu-Chieh .
THIN SOLID FILMS, 2007, 515 (18) :7217-7221
[5]
DAWOOD MY, 1986, ACTA OBSTET GYN SCAN, P7
[6]
EBERL DD, 1987, AM MINERAL, V72, P914
[7]
DYNAMICS AND SIGNIFICANCE OF PLACEBO-RESPONSE IN PRIMARY DYSMENORRHEA [J].
FEDELE, L ;
MARCHINI, M ;
ACAIA, B ;
GARAGIOLA, U ;
TIENGO, M .
PAIN, 1989, 36 (01) :43-47
[8]
Harel Zeev, 2004, J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol, V17, P75, DOI 10.1016/j.jpag.2004.01.002
[9]
Randomized clinical trial of the influence of local water-filtered infrared A irradiation on wound healing after abdominal surgery [J].
Hartel, M. ;
Hoffmann, G. ;
Wente, M. N. ;
Martignoni, M. E. ;
Buechler, M. W. ;
Friess, H. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2006, 93 (08) :952-960
[10]
Hayes KW, 2000, MANUAL PHYS AGENTS, P3