Prediction of sudden cardiac death after acute myocardial infarction:: role of Holter monitoring in the modern treatment era

被引:198
作者
Mäkikallio, TH
Barthel, P
Schneider, R
Bauer, A
Tapanainen, JM
Tulppo, MP
Schmidt, G
Huikuri, HV
机构
[1] Univ Oulu, Dept Internal Med, Div Cardiol, FIN-90014 Oulu, Finland
[2] Tech Univ Munich, Deutsch Herzzentrum, Munich, Germany
[3] Tech Univ Munich, Med Klin 1, Munich, Germany
关键词
death; sudden; myocardial infarction; heart rate; survival;
D O I
10.1093/eurheartj/ehi188
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims Current treatment may have changed the risk profiles of survivors of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We evaluated the utility of Holter based risk variables in the prediction of sudden cardiac death (SCD) among survivors of AMI treated with modern therapy. Methods and results A total of 2130 AMI patients (mean age 59 10 years) were included. The patients were treated with modern therapeutic strategies, for example, 94% were on beta-blocking therapy and 70% underwent coronary revascularization. Various risk parameters from Holter monitoring were analysed. During a median follow-up of 1012 days (interquartile range: 750-1416 days), cardiac mortality was 113/2130, including 52 SCDs. All Holter variables predicted the occurrence of SCD (P < 0.01), but only reduced post-ectopic turbulence slope (TS) (P < 0.001) and non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (P < 0.01) remained as marked SCD predictors after adjustment for age, diabetes, and ejection fraction (EF). In a subgroup analysis, none of the Holter variables predicted SCD among those with an EF <= 0.35, but many variables predicted SCD among those with an EF SYMBOL 0.35, particularly TS (hazard ratio 5.9; 95% CI 2.9-11.7, P < 0.001). Conclusion Among the post-AMI patients treated according to the current guidelines, the incidence of SCD is low. Various Holter variables still predict the occurrence of SCD, particularly among the patients with preserved left ventricular function.
引用
收藏
页码:762 / 769
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
AKHTAR M, 1992, CIRCULATION, V85, P1
[2]   Utility of current risk stratification tests for predicting major arrhythmic events after myocardial infarction [J].
Bailey, JJ ;
Berson, AS ;
Handelsman, H ;
Hodges, M .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2001, 38 (07) :1902-1911
[3]   Risk stratification after acute myocardial infarction by heart rate turbulence [J].
Barthel, P ;
Schneider, R ;
Bauer, A ;
Ulm, K ;
Schmitt, C ;
Schömig, A ;
Schmidt, G .
CIRCULATION, 2003, 108 (10) :1221-1226
[4]   EARLY ESTIMATION OF RISK BY ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC DETERMINATION OF WALL MOTION INDEX IN AN UNSELECTED POPULATION WITH ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION [J].
BERNING, J ;
STEENSGAARDHANSEN, F .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1990, 65 (09) :567-576
[5]   THE RELATIONSHIPS AMONG VENTRICULAR ARRHYTHMIAS, LEFT-VENTRICULAR DYSFUNCTION, AND MORTALITY IN THE 2 YEARS AFTER MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION [J].
BIGGER, JT ;
FLEISS, JL ;
KLEIGER, R ;
MILLER, JP ;
ROLNITZKY, LM .
CIRCULATION, 1984, 69 (02) :250-258
[6]   FREQUENCY-DOMAIN MEASURES OF HEART PERIOD VARIABILITY AND MORTALITY AFTER MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION [J].
BIGGER, JT ;
FLEISS, JL ;
STEINMAN, RC ;
ROLNITZKY, LM ;
KLEIGER, RE ;
ROTTMAN, JN .
CIRCULATION, 1992, 85 (01) :164-171
[7]   A randomized study of the prevention of sudden death in patients with coronary artery disease [J].
Buxton, AE ;
Lee, KL ;
Fisher, JD ;
Josephson, ME ;
Prystowsky, EN ;
Hafley, G .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 341 (25) :1882-1890
[8]   The clinical use of implantable cardioverter defibrillators: Where are we now? Where should we go? [J].
Buxton, AE .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 138 (06) :512-514
[9]  
Camm AJ, 1996, CIRCULATION, V93, P1043
[10]   Implantable cardioverter defibrillators in primary and secondary prevention: A systematic review of randomized, controlled trials [J].
Ezekowitz, JA ;
Armstrong, PW ;
McAlister, FA .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 138 (06) :445-452