Nutrient removal and plant biomass in a subsurface flow constructed wetland in Brisbane, Australia

被引:34
作者
Browning, K [1 ]
Greenway, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Griffith Univ, Sch Environm Engn, Nathan, Qld 4111, Australia
关键词
biomass harvesting; macrophytes; nutrient removal; secondary effluent; subsurface flow; constructed wetland;
D O I
10.2166/wst.2003.0315
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Four native plant species (Baumea articulata, Carex fascicularis, Philydrum lanuginosum and Schoenoplectus mucronatus) are being investigated for their suitability in subsurface flow wetlands. The pilot scale Oxley Wetland, Brisbane, consists of 4 cells with different sized gravel (5 mm and 20 mm). The project aims to investigate nutrient removal rates and removal efficiency; nutrient storage in plant biomass; effect of cropping on plant regrowth, and the effect of gravel size on both water treatment and plant growth. Average daily mass removal rates ranged from 7.3 Kgha(-1)d(-1) NH4-N in Cell D to 4.6 Kgha(-1)d(-1) in Cell C i.e. 37%-22% removal efficiency respectively; 5.2 Kgha(-1) d(-1) NOx-N in Cell C to 1.3 Kgha(-1)d(-1) in Cell A (i.e. 75%-22% removal efficiency) and 0.8 Kgha(-1)d(-1) PO4-P in Cell A to 0.1 Kgha(-1)d(-1) in Cell C (i.e. 10%-1% removal efficiency). Cell A was the youngest wetland with new 5 mm gravel. Plant biomass was highest for Baumea and Carex. Gravel size does not appear to have affected biomass and recovery following cropping. Carex consistently had the highest harvested above ground biomass with high re-growth following cropping. Cropping appears to have retarded growth of the other three species with Schoenoplectus consistently having slowest regrowth. Plant biomass and nutrient storage was highest in Cell A and accounted for 11% of nitrogen removal and 3% of phosphorus removal.
引用
收藏
页码:183 / 189
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   GROWTH-CHARACTERISTICS OF 3 MACROPHYTE SPECIES GROWING IN A NATURAL AND CONSTRUCTED WETLAND SYSTEM [J].
ADCOCK, PW ;
GANF, GG .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1994, 29 (04) :95-102
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1992, STAND METH EX WAT WA
[3]   Do macrophytes play a role in constructed treatment wetlands? [J].
Brix, H .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1997, 35 (05) :11-17
[4]  
BROWNING K, 2002, P 5 INT IWA C WAST S
[5]  
COOPER PF, 1996, WRC PUBLICATION
[6]   ROLE OF AQUATIC PLANTS IN WASTE-WATER TREATMENT BY ARTIFICIAL WETLANDS [J].
GERSBERG, RM ;
ELKINS, BV ;
LYON, SR ;
GOLDMAN, CR .
WATER RESEARCH, 1986, 20 (03) :363-368
[7]   NITROGEN REMOVAL IN ARTIFICIAL WETLANDS [J].
GERSBERG, RM ;
ELKINS, BV ;
GOLDMAN, CR .
WATER RESEARCH, 1983, 17 (09) :1009-1014
[8]   Constructed wetlands in Queensland: Performance efficiency and nutrient bioaccumulation [J].
Greenway, M ;
Woolley, A .
ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 1999, 12 (1-2) :39-55
[9]   Changes in plant biomass and nutrient removal over 3 years in a constructed wetland in Cairns, Australia [J].
Greenway, M ;
Woolley, A .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 44 (11-12) :303-310
[10]  
Greenway M, 1997, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V35, P135, DOI 10.1016/S0273-1223(97)00062-0