Feature-level and decision-level fusion of noncoincidently sampled sensors for land mine detection

被引:96
作者
Gunatilaka, AH
Baertlein, BA
机构
[1] Lucent Technol, Columbus, OH 43213 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Electrosci Lab, Columbus, OH 43212 USA
关键词
land mines; sensor fusion; infrared; ground penetrating radar; metal detectors;
D O I
10.1109/34.927459
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
We present and compare methods for feature-level (predetection) and decision-level (postdetection) fusion of multisensor data. This study emphasizes fusion techniques that are suitable for noncommensurate data sampled at noncoincident points. Decision-level fusion is most convenient for such data, but it is suboptimal in principle, since targets not detected by all sensors will not obtain the full benefits of fusion. A novel algorithm for feature-level fusion of noncommensurate, noncoincidently sampled data is described, in which a model is fitted to the sensor data and the model parameters are used as features. Formulations for both feature-level and decision-level fusion are described, along with some practical simplifications. A closed-form expression is available for feature-level fusion of normally distributed data and this expression is used with simulated data to study requirements for sample position accuracy in multisensor data. The performance of feature-level and decision-level fusion algorithms are compared for experimental data acquired by a metal detector, a ground-penetrating radar, and an infrared camera at a challenging test site containing surrogate mines. It is found that fusion of binary decisions does not perform significantly better than the best available sensor. The performance of feature-level fusion is significantly better than the individual sensors, as is decision-level fusion when detection confidence information is also available ("soft-decision" fusion).
引用
收藏
页码:577 / 589
页数:13
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
BAERTLEIN B, 1994, N6133193C0050 BALL S
[2]  
BRUSMARK B, 1998, P 7 INT C GROUND PEN
[3]  
CHAUDHURI S, 1990, P SOC PHOTO-OPT INS, V1306, P187, DOI 10.1117/12.21624
[4]  
CLARK GA, 1993, P SOC PHOTO-OPT INS, V1942, P178, DOI 10.1117/12.160338
[5]   ANALYSIS OF AN ELECTROMAGNETIC INDUCTION DETECTOR FOR REAL-TIME LOCATION OF BURIED OBJECTS [J].
DAS, Y ;
MCFEE, JE ;
TOEWS, J ;
STUART, GC .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 1990, 28 (03) :278-288
[6]  
Dasarathy B.V., 1994, DECISION FUSION
[7]   Sensor fusion for anti personnel landmine detection, a case study [J].
den Breejen, E ;
Schutte, K ;
Cremer, F .
DETECTION AND REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR MINES AND MINELIKE TARGETS IV, PTS 1 AND 2, 1999, 3710 :1235-1245
[8]   Comparison of pre-detection and post-detection fusion for mine detection [J].
Gunatilaka, A ;
Baertlein, BA .
DETECTION AND REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR MINES AND MINELIKE TARGETS IV, PTS 1 AND 2, 1999, 3710 :1212-1223
[9]  
Gunatilaka A. H., 2000, P SPIE, V4038
[10]  
Hall D. L., 1992, MATH TECHNIQUES MULT