Technological Presence: Actuality and Potentiality in Subject Constitution

被引:21
作者
Kiran, Asle H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Twente, Dept Philosophy, Fac Behav Sci, NL-7500 AE Enschede, Netherlands
关键词
Technology; Technical mediation; Lifeworld; Subjectivity; Heidegger; Becoming;
D O I
10.1007/s10746-011-9208-7
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Technical mediation shapes our experience of the world, but it also shapes our experience of ourselves. In this paper, I argue that in order to understand the latter aspect of technical mediation, we need to expand on notions of technical mediation that focuses on actual use, and bring in possible use as well. The concept of technical mediation must therefore be grounded in a more general concept of technological presence. This concept indicates that technology harbours both actuality and potentiality, the latter denoting that technologies offer possible actions, through which we realise specific actions, and, more importantly, realise ourselves; it is through the technological presence in our lifeworld we are able to recognise our own possibilities to be in and act in the lifeworld. The technologically revealed possibilities enable the subject to be constituted in a temporal forward-directedness, so that technological potentiality becomes co-constitutive of the subjects that we are and may become.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 93
页数:17
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1982, IDEAS PERTAINING PUR
[2]   Individual and community in early Heidegger:: Situating das Man, the Man-self, and self-ownership in Dasein's ontological structure [J].
Boedeker, EC .
INQUIRY-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 2001, 44 (01) :63-100
[3]  
Feenberg A., 1999, QUESTIONING TECHNOLO
[4]  
Heidegger M., 1926, BEING TIME
[5]  
Heidegger M., 1992, History of the concept of time
[6]  
Heidegger Martin., 1977, The question concerning technology and other essays
[7]  
Hofstadter Albert., 1988, BASIC PROBLEMS PHENO
[8]  
Ihde D, 1990, TECHNOLOGY LIFEWORLD, DOI DOI 10.5860/CHOICE.28-1535
[9]  
Ihde D., 1979, TECHNICS PRAXIS
[10]  
Ihde Don., 2010, Heidegger's Technologies: Postphenomenological Perspectives