Assessment of patients with low-risk chest pain in the emergency department: Head-to-head comparison of exercise stress echocardiography and exercise myocardial SPECT

被引:47
作者
Conti, A
Sammicheli, L
Gallini, C
Costanzo, EN
Antoniucci, D
Barletta, G
机构
[1] Careggi Hosp, Dept Emergency Med, Florence, Italy
[2] Careggi Hosp, Chest Pain Unit, Florence, Italy
[3] Careggi Hosp, Dept Nucl Med, Florence, Italy
[4] Careggi Hosp, Dept Images, Florence, Italy
[5] Careggi Hosp, Dept Heart & Vessels, Florence, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.ahj.2004.09.048
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives The aim of the study was to compare head-to-head the performance of exercise tolerance test-stress echocardiography (ex-Echo) and exercise stress-perfusion nuclear imaging (exercise-single-photon emission computed tomography [ex-SPECT]) for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients evaluated at the chest pain unit with delay from chest pain (CP) onset. Background As an early triage strategy for CAD in emergency medicine, ex-Echo could have the advantage of widespread availability and low costs. Methods In the years 2000-2002, 503 consecutive patients (mean age 60 years) with recent (<24 hours) CP and nonischemic electrocardiogram (ECG), in whom CAD remained undiagnosed after first line 6-hour work-up including serum markers of myocardial injury and resting echocardiogram, underwent ex-Echo and ex-SPECT within 24 hours. Patients with (+)ex-Echo or (+)ex-SPECT or (+)ex-ECG or abnormal troponin I were referred to coronary angiography; otherwise, they were discharged and followed up. End points were coronary stenosis >= 50% and cardiovascular events at 6-month follow-up. Results Ninety-nine patients (20%) had (+)ex-Echo and 121 (24%) (+)ex-SPECT; CAD was diagnosed in 81% and 67%, respectively; positive tests were concordant in 69%. In negative ex-Echo and ex-SPECT, final evidence of CAD emerged in 14 and 13, respectively. Ex-Echo demonstrated higher accuracy than ex-SPECT (93% +/- 1% vs 89% +/- 1 %), optimal specificity (95% +/- 5% vs 90% +/- 5%), and positive predictive value (81% +/- 4% vs 67% +/- 4%); moreover, in the case of (-)ex-ECG, observed effective likelihood ratio indicates a (+)synergy between ex-ECG and ex-Echo. Conclusions Ex-Echo can be an effective diagnostic strategy in the early triage of CP patients, improving diagnosis in case of (-)ex-ECG and reducing unnecessary angiography number. Its drawback is represented by the 5% of missed diagnosis.
引用
收藏
页码:894 / 901
页数:8
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Myocardial infarction redefined -: A consensus Document of the Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the Redefinition of Myocardial Infarction [J].
Alpert, JS ;
Antman, E ;
Apple, F ;
Armstrong, PW ;
Bassand, JP ;
de Luna, AB ;
Beller, G ;
Breithardt, G ;
Chaitman, BR ;
Clemmensen, P ;
Falk, E ;
Fishbein, MC ;
Galvani, M ;
Garson, A ;
Grines, C ;
Hamm, C ;
Jaffe, A ;
Katus, H ;
Kjekshus, J ;
Klein, W ;
Klootwijk, P ;
Lenfant, C ;
Levy, D ;
Levy, RI ;
Luepker, R ;
Marcus, F ;
Näslund, U ;
Ohman, M ;
Pahlm, O ;
Poole-Wilson, P ;
Popp, R ;
Alto, P ;
Pyörälä, K ;
Ravkilde, J ;
Rehnquist, N ;
Roberts, W ;
Roberts, R ;
Roelandt, J ;
Rydén, L ;
Sans, S ;
Simoons, ML ;
Thygesen, K ;
Tunstall-Pedoe, H ;
Underwood, R ;
Uretsky, BF ;
Van de Werf, F ;
Voipio-Pulkki, LM ;
Wagner, G ;
Wallentin, L ;
Wijns, W .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2000, 36 (03) :959-969
[2]   Prognostic value of predischarge dobutamine stress echocardiography in chest pain patients with a negative cardiac troponin T [J].
Bholasingh, R ;
Cornel, JH ;
Kamp, O ;
van Straalen, JP ;
Sanders, GT ;
Tijssen, JGP ;
Umans, VAWM ;
Visser, CA ;
de Winter, RJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 41 (04) :596-602
[3]   Emergency department evaluation of chest pain using exercise stress echocardiography [J].
Buchsbaum, MS ;
Marshall, ES ;
Levine, BJ ;
Bennett, MA ;
DiSabatino, A ;
O'Connor, RE ;
Jasani, NB .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2001, 8 (02) :196-199
[4]   Prognostic value of stress echocardiography in the evaluation of atypical chest pain patients without known coronary artery disease [J].
Cohon, PJ ;
Mobarek, SK ;
Milani, RV ;
Lavie, CJ ;
Cassidy, MM ;
Murgo, JP ;
Cheirif, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1998, 81 (05) :545-551
[5]   Effectiveness of a multidisciplinary chest pain unit for the assessment of coronary syndromes and risk stratification in the Florence area [J].
Conti, A ;
Paladini, B ;
Toccafondi, S ;
Magazzini, S ;
Olivotto, I ;
Galassi, F ;
Pieroni, C ;
Santoro, G ;
Antoniucci, D ;
Berni, G .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2002, 144 (04) :630-635
[6]   Early detection of myocardial ischaemia in the emergency department by rest or exercise 99mTc tracer myocardial SPET in patients with chest pain and non-diagnostic ECG [J].
Conti, A ;
Gallini, C ;
Costanzo, E ;
Ferri, P ;
Matteini, M ;
Paladini, B ;
Francois, C ;
Grifoni, S ;
Migliorini, A ;
Antoniucci, D ;
Pieroni, C ;
Berni, G .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2001, 28 (12) :1806-1810
[7]   LIMITED ASSURANCES [J].
DIAMOND, GA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1989, 63 (01) :99-100
[8]   Comparison of acute rest myocardial perfusion imaging and serum markers of myocardial injury in patients with chest pain syndromes [J].
Duca, MD ;
Giri, S ;
Wu, AHB ;
Morris, RS ;
Cyr, GM ;
Ahlberg, A ;
White, M ;
Waters, DD ;
Heller, GV .
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY, 1999, 6 (06) :570-576
[9]   Task force on the management of chest [J].
Erhardt, L ;
Herlitz, J ;
Bossaert, L ;
Halinen, M ;
Keltai, M ;
Koster, R ;
Marcassa, C ;
Quinn, T ;
van Weert, H .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2002, 23 (15) :1153-1176
[10]  
*EUR COMM, RAD PROT 118 REF GUI