Major innovation as a dynamic capability: A systems approach

被引:213
作者
O'Connor, Gina Colarelli [1 ]
机构
[1] Rensselaer Polytech Inst, Lally Sch Management & Technol, Troy, NY 12180 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1540-5885.2008.00304.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Major innovation (MI), composed of both radical and really new innovation, is an important mechanism for enabling the growth and renewal of an enterprise. Yet it is poorly managed in most established firms, and success stories are rare. This conceptual article draws on systems theory, recent advances in dynamic capabilities theory, and the management of innovation literature to offer a framework for building an MI dynamic capability. The framework is composed of seven elements that together form a management system rather than a process-based approach to nurturing radical innovation. These system elements are (1) an identifiable organization structure; (2) interface mechanisms with the mainstream organization, some of which are tightly coupled and others of which are loose; (3) exploratory processes; (4) requisite skills and talent development, given that entrepreneurial talent is not present in most organizations; (5) governance and decision-making mechanisms at the project, MI portfolio, and MI system levels; (6) appropriate performance metrics; and (7) an appropriate culture and leadership context. It is argued that dynamic capabilities for phenomena as complex as MI must be considered in a systems fashion rather than as operating routines and repeatable processes as the literature currently suggests. A set of propositions is offered regarding how each element should play out in this parallel management system. Finally, each element's role in the major innovation system is justified in terms of four criteria required by systems theory: (1) The system is identifiable, and its elements are interdependent; (2) the effect of the whole is greater than the sum of the parts; (3) homeostasis is achieved through interaction and networking with the larger organization; and (4) there is a clear purpose in the larger system in which the MI management system is embedded. Examples are given to demonstrate these criteria. Systems theory offers a new way of thinking about dynamic capability development and management.
引用
收藏
页码:313 / 330
页数:18
相关论文
共 127 条
[1]   Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions [J].
Ahuja, G ;
Lampert, CM .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2001, 22 (6-7) :521-543
[2]   Assessing the work environment for creativity [J].
Amabile, TM ;
Conti, R ;
Coon, H ;
Lazenby, J ;
Herron, M .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1996, 39 (05) :1154-1184
[3]   RESETTING THE CLOCK - THE DYNAMICS OF ORGANIZATIONAL-CHANGE AND FAILURE [J].
AMBURGEY, TL ;
KELLY, D ;
BARNETT, WP .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1993, 38 (01) :51-73
[4]   STRATEGIC ASSETS AND ORGANIZATIONAL RENT [J].
AMIT, R ;
SCHOEMAKER, PJH .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1993, 14 (01) :33-46
[5]  
[Anonymous], ENTREPRENEURSHIP STR
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2000, RADICAL INNOVATION
[7]  
[Anonymous], GEN SYSTEMS THEORY
[8]  
Argote Linda., 2012, ORG LEARNING CREATIN, V2nd
[9]  
Argyris C., 1974, THEORY PRACTICE
[10]  
Baden-Fuller C., 1995, British Journal of Management, V6, pS3, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1467-8551.1995.TB00134.X