In-person vs telephone-administered multiple-pass 24-hour recalls in women: Validation with doubly labeled water

被引:139
作者
Tran, KM
Johnson, RK
Soultanakis, RP
Matthews, DE
机构
[1] Univ Vermont, Coll Agr & Life Sci, Deans Off, Burlington, VT 05405 USA
[2] Kaiser Permanente, St Albans, VT USA
[3] Univ Vermont, Dept Nutr & Food Sci, Burlington, VT 05405 USA
[4] Univ Vermont, Dept Med, Burlington, VT USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0002-8223(00)00227-3
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Objective To determine the accuracy of energy intakes estimated with the multiple-pass 24-hour recall method in women by conducting in-person and telephone interviews. Doubly labeled water measurements of total energy expenditure were used for validation. Subjects Thirty-five weight-stable women (mean age = 30 years, range = 19 to 46 years) participated. Design Total energy expenditure was measured over a 14-day period using the doubly labeled water method. During this time, 4 multiple-pass 24-hour recalls were obtained from the women (2 in-person, 2 by telephone) who were provided 2-dimensional food models to estimate portion sizes. The Food Intake Analysis System was used to analyze recall data. Statistical analyses Paired t tests were conducted to examine differences between energy intake estimated from the telephone and in-person interviews. Agreement between the energy intake estimates from the telephone recalls and the in-person recalls was assessed using the technique of Bland and Altman. Paired t tests were used to compare energy intake estimated from the telephone and in-person recalls to total energy expenditure. Results No significant difference in mean daily energy intake was found between the telephone (2,253 +/- 688 kcal) and in-person (2,173 +/- 656 kcal) interviews (P = .36). However, the mean energy intake from each interview method was significantly lower than total energy expenditure (2,644 +/- 503 kcal) (P = .006 and .001, respectively). Applications/conclusions Underreporting of energy intake was widespread in the sample. Although the multiple-pass 24-hour recall method did not generate a group measure of energy intake that was accurate or unbiased, the telephone-administered multiple-pass 24-hour recall was just as effective in estimating energy intake as the recall administered in-person. Dietetics professionals should be aware of the pervasive and serious problem of underreporting of self-reported food intakes.
引用
收藏
页码:777 / 783
页数:7
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, REPORT DIETARY GUIDE
[2]   ENERGY-EXPENDITURE IN OBESE AND NONOBESE ADOLESCENTS [J].
BANDINI, LG ;
SCHOELLER, DA ;
DIETZ, WH .
PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 1990, 27 (02) :198-203
[3]   NUMBER OF DAYS OF FOOD-INTAKE RECORDS REQUIRED TO ESTIMATE INDIVIDUAL AND GROUP NUTRIENT INTAKES WITH DEFINED CONFIDENCE [J].
BASIOTIS, PP ;
WELSH, SO ;
CRONIN, FJ ;
KELSAY, JL ;
MERTZ, W .
JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 1987, 117 (09) :1638-1641
[4]   SOURCES OF VARIATION IN ENERGY-INTAKE BY MEN AND WOMEN AS DETERMINED FROM ONE YEARS DAILY DIETARY RECORDS [J].
BASIOTIS, PP ;
THOMAS, RG ;
KELSAY, JL ;
MERTZ, W .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 1989, 50 (03) :448-453
[5]  
BLACK AE, 1986, HUM NUTR-CLIN NUTR, V40C, P381
[6]   MEASUREMENTS OF TOTAL-ENERGY EXPENDITURE PROVIDE INSIGHTS INTO THE VALIDITY OF DIETARY MEASUREMENTS OF ENERGY-INTAKE [J].
BLACK, AE ;
PRENTICE, AM ;
GOLDBERG, GR ;
JEBB, SA ;
BINGHAM, SA ;
LIVINGSTONE, MBE ;
COWARD, WA .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DIETETIC ASSOCIATION, 1993, 93 (05) :572-579
[7]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[8]  
BORRUD LG, 1997, 961 USDA AGR RES SER
[9]  
Briefel RR, 1997, AM J CLIN NUTR, V65, P1203
[10]  
DUBOIS S, 1990, J AM DIET ASSOC, V90, P1680