Multiple test procedures for identifying the maximum safe dose

被引:18
作者
Tamhane, AC [1 ]
Dunnett, CW
Green, JW
Wetherington, JD
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Dept Ind Engn & Management Sci, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
[2] McMaster Univ, Dept Math & Stat, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada
[3] McMaster Univ, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada
[4] Dupont Co Inc, Haskell Lab Toxicol & Ind Med, Safety Hlth & Environm Excellence Ctr, Newark, DE 19714 USA
[5] Dupont Pharmaceut Co, Non Clin Phase 1, Wilmington, DE 19880 USA
关键词
dose response; familywise error rate; minimum unsafe dose; multiple comparisons; multivariate t-distribution; step-down multiple testing procedure; toxicology;
D O I
10.1198/016214501753208546
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
we consider dose response studies for safety assessment of crop protection compounds and drugs, and we offer a hypothesis testing approach for identifying the maximum dose level that is guaranteed to be safe with preassigned confidence. The focus is on step-down (SD) multiple test procedures for identifying the maximum safe dose. We propose two classes of contrasts among the dose means as test statistics for these procedures: pairwise contrasts (PC) and Helmert contrasts (HC). The first procedure (SD2PC) consists of a sequence of ordinary t tests and is thus easy to apply, but it can have very low power for certain step response functions. The second procedure (SD1HC) does not suffer from this drawback, but it requires a weak monotonicity assumption for its mathematical validity. The powers of SD2PC and SD1HC are studied via Monte Carlo simulation. We recommend SD2PC for linear response functions and SD1HC for step response functions. The procedures are illustrated by applying them to data from an aquatic toxicity laboratory experiment conducted to assess the safe level of a pesticide.
引用
收藏
页码:835 / 843
页数:9
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], SELECTED TABLES MATH
[2]  
BARTHOLOMEW DJ, 1959, BIOMETRIKA, V46, P36
[3]   A note on multiple testing procedures in dose finding [J].
Bauer, P .
BIOMETRICS, 1997, 53 (03) :1125-1128
[4]   STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN THE EVALUATION OF CHRONIC AQUATIC TOXICITY STUDIES [J].
CAPIZZI, T ;
OPPENHEIMER, L ;
MEHTA, H ;
NAIMIE, H ;
FAIR, JL .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1985, 19 (01) :35-43
[5]  
CHASE GR, 1974, BIOMETRIKA, V61, P569, DOI 10.1093/biomet/61.3.569
[6]   A NEW METHOD FOR DETERMINING ALLOWABLE DAILY INTAKES [J].
CRUMP, KS .
FUNDAMENTAL AND APPLIED TOXICOLOGY, 1984, 4 (05) :854-871
[7]  
Dunnett C W, 1998, J Biopharm Stat, V8, P353, DOI 10.1080/10543409808835245
[8]   ALGORITHM AS-251 - MULTIVARIATE NORMAL PROBABILITY INTEGRALS WITH PRODUCT CORRELATION STRUCTURE [J].
DUNNETT, CW .
APPLIED STATISTICS-JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES C, 1989, 38 (03) :564-579
[10]   A STEP-UP MULTIPLE TEST PROCEDURE [J].
DUNNETT, CW ;
TAMHANE, AC .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1992, 87 (417) :162-170