News and social media: Windows into community perspectives on disinvestment

被引:12
作者
Street, Jackie M. [1 ]
Hennessy, Sophie E. [1 ]
Watt, Amber M. [1 ]
Hiller, Janet E. [2 ]
Elshaug, Adam G.
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Sch Populat Hlth & Clin Practice Level 7, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
[2] Australian Catholic Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Mdc, Vic 3065, Australia
基金
澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会;
关键词
Disinvestment; Community perspectives; Assisted reproductive technologies; Social media; Web2.0; HEALTH TECHNOLOGY-ASSESSMENT;
D O I
10.1017/S026646231100033X
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: The aim of this study, in the context of disinvestment related health technology assessment, is to examine whether analysis of Web 2.0-commercial media output, blogs, and discussion forums-can provide an understanding of media framing, community perspectives, and the sociopolitical aspects of an entrenched technology. Methods: Thematic analysis of relevant data from fifty-nine media articles, thirty-nine discussion forums, thirteen blogs, and three Facebook pages relating to our case study: public funding for assisted reproductive technology services. Mainstream media and community-based social media responses were compared. Results: Media responses were narrow, primarily describing emotive individual narratives or the political nexus of interests. Community (including patient) responses were broader including discussion of opportunity cost and vested interests but mostly reflected the polar ends of the debate, diverging strongly for or against disinvestment from public funding. Conclusion: Web2.0 and media analysis offers an inexpensive method to capture media portrayal, divergent community responses both to that portrayal and independent of it, and insight into the sociopolitical aspects of an entrenched technology undergoing disinvestment debate.
引用
收藏
页码:376 / 383
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Abelson Julia, 2009, Healthc Policy, V4, pe113
[2]   Including the public in pandemic planning: a deliberative approach [J].
Braunack-Mayer, Annette J. ;
Street, Jackie M. ;
Rogers, Wendy A. ;
Givney, Rodney ;
Moss, John R. ;
Hiller, Janet E. .
BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2010, 10
[3]  
CHESTER R, 2009, IVF MUM WAGES LETT W
[4]  
CLAREGELUK V, 2009, HELP SAVE IVF FUNDIN
[5]  
CRESSWELL A, 2009, OBSTET URGED SCALE B
[6]  
DAVIES J, 2009, IVF BUDGET CUTS WHAT
[7]  
DOHERTY B, 2007, AUSTR POL STUD ASS A
[8]  
DOHERTY E, 2009, IVF COUPLES FACE PRI
[9]  
DRAPE J, 2009, BLOCKING IVF CHANGES
[10]  
DUNLEVY S, 2009, IVF MUMS FORK OUT CU