Quantitative DNA Methylation Analysis Detects Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasms Type 3 and Worse

被引:95
作者
Lai, Hung-Cheng [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Lin, Ya-Wen [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Huang, Rui-Lan [1 ]
Chung, Ming-Tzeung [6 ]
Wang, Hui-Chen [1 ]
Liao, Yu-Ping [2 ]
Su, Po-Hsuan [4 ]
Liu, Yung-Liang [1 ]
Yu, Mu-Hsien [1 ]
机构
[1] Triserv Gen Hosp, Natl Def Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Taipei 114, Taiwan
[2] Natl Def Med Ctr, Grad Inst Life Sci, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] Natl Def Med Ctr, Lab Epigenet & Canc Stem Cells, Taipei, Taiwan
[4] Natl Def Med Ctr, Grad Inst Med Sci, Taipei, Taiwan
[5] Natl Def Med Ctr, Dept Microbiol & Immunol, Taipei, Taiwan
[6] Tao Yuan Armed Forces Gen Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Tao Yuan, Taiwan
关键词
cervical intraepithelial neoplasm; cervical cancer; epigenetics; methylation; quantitative methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; HUMAN-PAPILLOMAVIRUS; NATURAL-HISTORY; CANCER; MARKERS; IDENTIFICATION; CARCINOMA; WOMEN; RISK; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.25252
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
BACKGROUND: DNA methylation may be used a potential biomarker for detecting cervical cancer. The authors of this report used quantitative methylation analysis of 4 genes in a full spectrum of cervical lesions to test its potential clinical application. METHODS: This hospital-based, retrospective, case-control study was conducted in 185 patients and included patients who had a normal uterine cervix (n = 53), cervical intraepithelial neoplasm type 1 (CIN1) (n 37), CIN2 (n = 22), CIN3 (n = 24), carcinoma in situ (CIS) (n = 22), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC, n = 20), and adenocarcinoma (AC) (n = 7). Methylation levels of the genes sex-determining region Y, box 1 (SOX1); paired box gene 1 (PAX1); LIM homeobox transcription factor 1 alpha (LMX1A), and NK6 transcription factor-related locus 1 (NKX6-1) were determined by using real-time methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification. Cutoff values of the percentage of methylation reference (PMR) for different diagnoses were determined to test the sensitivity and specificity and to generate receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Two-sided Mann-Whitney U tests were used to test differences in PMR between groups. RESULTS: The PMRs of the 4 genes were significantly higher in CIN3 and worse (CIN3+) lesions than the PMRs in specimens of normal cervix and CIN1 or CIN2 (P < .001). ROC curve analysis demonstrated that the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for detecting CIN3+ lesions were 0.88, 0.82, and 0.95, respectively, for SOX1; 0.78, 0.91, and 0.89, respectively, for PAX1; 0.77, 0.88, and 0.90, respectively, for LMX1A; and 0.93, 0.97, and 0.97, respectively, for NKX6-1. CONCLUSIONS: The current results indicated that quantitative PCR-based testing for DNA methylation of 4 genes holds great promise for cervical cancer screening and warrants further population-based studies using standardized DNA methylation testing. Cancer 2010;116:4266-74. (C) 2010 American Cancer Society.
引用
收藏
页码:4266 / 4274
页数:9
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2005, Obstet Gynecol, V105, P905
[2]
DNA methylation analysis in liquid-based cytology for cervical cancer screening [J].
Apostolidou, Sophia ;
Hadwin, Richard ;
Burnell, Matthew ;
Jones, Allison ;
Baff, Donna ;
Pyndiah, Nitisha ;
Mould, Tim ;
Jacobs, Ian J. ;
Beddows, Simon ;
Kocjan, Gabrijela ;
Widschwendter, Martin .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 125 (12) :2995-3002
[3]
Baay MFD, 2004, EUR J GYNAECOL ONCOL, V25, P665
[4]
Epigenetic gene silencing in cancer - a mechanism for early oncogenic pathway addiction? [J].
Baylin, SB ;
Ohm, JE .
NATURE REVIEWS CANCER, 2006, 6 (02) :107-116
[5]
Prior cone biopsy: Prediction of preterm birth by cervical ultrasound [J].
Berghella, V ;
Pereira, L ;
Gariepy, A ;
Simonazzi, G .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 191 (04) :1393-1397
[6]
Pobascam, a population-based randomized controlled trial for implementation of high-risk HPV testing in cervical screening: Design, methods and baseline data of 44,102 women [J].
Bulkmans, NWJ ;
Rozendaal, L ;
Snijders, PJF ;
Voorhorst, FJ ;
Boeke, AJP ;
Zandwijken, GRJ ;
van Kemenade, FJ ;
Verheijen, RHM ;
von Groningen, K ;
Boon, ME ;
Keuning, HJF ;
van Ballegooijen, M ;
van den Brule, AJC ;
Meijer, CJLM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2004, 110 (01) :94-101
[7]
CIN2 is a much less reproducible and less valid diagnosis than CIN3: Results from a histological review of population-based cervical samples [J].
Carreon, Joseph D. ;
Sherman, Mark E. ;
Guillen, Diego ;
Solomon, Diane ;
Herrero, Rolando ;
Jeronimo, Jose ;
Wacholder, Sholom ;
Rodriguez, Ana Cecilia ;
Morales, Jorge ;
Hutchinson, Martha ;
Burk, Robert D. ;
Schiffman, Mark .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2007, 26 (04) :441-446
[8]
Evidence for Frequent Regression of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia-Grade 2 [J].
Castle, Philip E. ;
Schiffinan, Mark ;
Eeler, Cosette M. ;
Solomon, Diane .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 113 (01) :18-25
[9]
CHRISTOPHERSON WM, 1970, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V26, P808, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(197010)26:4<808::AID-CNCR2820260411>3.0.CO
[10]
2-S