Lumbar disk herniation: Do MR imaging findings predict recurrence after surgical diskectomy?

PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate if the-degree of disk degeneration and disk herniation volume at magnetic resonance (MR) imaging are risk factors for recurrent disk herniation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional review board permits such retrospective studies, and individual informed consent was not required. MR imaging findings obtained before initial diskectomy in 30 patients (mean age, 42.8 years; 10 women, 20 men) with recurrent disk-herniation (study group) and 30 patients (mean age, 42.2 years; nine women, 21 men) without recurrence for at least 2 years after surgery (control group) were compared. Disk degeneration was assessed on T2-weighted sagittal MR images with a five-point grading system (grade Indicated no degeneration; grade II, horizontal hypointense bands within disk; grade III, inhomogeneous disk with intermediate signal intensity; grade IV, no distinction between inner and outer parts of disk; and grade V, collapsed hypointense disk). Disk herniation was classified as representing protrusion, extrusion, or sequestration. The volume of both the affected intervertebral disk and the herniated disk material was measured. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were performed by two readers. The chi(2) test was used for comparison of categorical variables. For comparison of disk degeneration and volumes between patients with and those without recurrence, a paired two-tailed t test was used. Odds ratios based on the extent of disk degeneration were calculated for the entire sample. RESULTS: Advanced disk degeneration (grades IV and V) was significantly less frequent in the study group thin, in the control group (P <.006). The. risk of recurrent disk herniation decreased by a factor of 3.4 for each increase in grade of disk degeneration (odds ratio: 3.58; 95% confidence interval: 13, 9.6; P =.011). Mean disk herniation volume as a percentage of intervertebral disk volume was 10.59% +/- 3.41 in the,study group and 11.56% +/- 3.84 in the control group. This, difference Was not significant (P=.31). CONCLUSION: Minor disk degeneration but not herniation volume represents a risk factor for the recurrence of disk herniation after diskectomy. (C) RSNA, 2005.