The Use of Prolonged Peripheral Neural Blockade After Lower Extremity Amputation: The Effect on Symptoms Associated with Phantom Limb Syndrome

被引:133
作者
Borghi, Battista [2 ]
D'Addabbo, Marco [1 ,2 ]
White, Paul F. [3 ,4 ]
Gallerani, Pina [2 ]
Toccaceli, Letizia [2 ]
Raffaeli, William [5 ]
Tognu, Andrea [2 ]
Fabbri, Nicola [6 ]
Mercuri, Mario [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, Dept Surg & Anesthesiol Sci, Bologna, Italy
[2] Rizzoli Orthoped Inst, Res Unit Anesthesia & Intens Care, Bologna, Italy
[3] Policlin Abano Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesia & Crit Care, Abano Terme, Italy
[4] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesia, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
[5] Hosp Rimini, Pain Therapy & Palliat Care Unit, Rimini, Italy
[6] Rizzoli Orthoped Inst, Ward Oncol Orthoped Trauma Surg 4, Bologna, Italy
关键词
POSTAMPUTATION STUMP; REGIONAL ANALGESIA; NEUROPATHIC PAIN; PREVENTION; INFUSION; BUPIVACAINE; AMPUTEES; SURGERY; KETAMINE; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181f4e848
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 [麻醉学];
摘要
BACKGROUND: Phantom limb syndrome (PLS) is common after limb amputations, involving up to 90% of amputees. Although many different therapies have been evaluated, none has been found to be highly effective. Therefore, we evaluated the efficacy of a prolonged perineural infusion of a high concentration of local anesthetic solution in preventing PLS. METHODS: A perineural catheter was placed immediately before or during surgery in 71 patients undergoing lower extremity amputation. A continuous infusion of 0.5% ropivacaine was started intraoperatively at 5 mL/h using an elastomeric (nonelectronic) pump, and continued for 4 to 83 days after surgery. PLS was evaluated on the first postoperative day and then 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks, and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after surgery. To evaluate the presence and severity of PLS while the patient was receiving the ropivacaine infusion, it was discontinued for 6 to 12 hours before each assessment period (i.e., until the sensation in the extremity returned). The severity of phantom limb and stump pain was assessed using a 5-point verbal rating scale (VRS), with 0 = no pain to 4 = intolerable pain, and "phantom" sensations were recorded as present or absent. If the VRS score was > 1 or significant phantom sensations were present, the ropivacaine infusion was immediately restarted at 5 mL/h. If the VRS score remained at 0 to 1 and the patient had not experienced phantom sensations for 48 hours, the infusion was permanently discontinued and the catheter was removed. RESULTS: Median duration of the local anesthetic infusion was 30 days (95% confidence interval, 25-30 days). On postoperative day 1, 73% of the patients complained of severe-to-intolerable pain (visual analog scale > 2). However, the incidence of severe-to-intolerable phantom limb pain was only 3% at the end of the 12-month evaluation period. At the end of the 12-month period, the percentage of patients with VRS pain scores were 0 = 84%, 1 = 10%, 2 = 3%, 3 = 3%, and 4 = none. However, phantom limb sensations were present in 39% of patients at the end of the 12-month evaluation period. All patients were able to manage the elastomeric catheter infusion system at home. CONCLUSION: Use of a prolonged postoperative perineural infusion of ropivacaine 0.5% seems to be an effective therapy for the treatment of phantom limb pain and sensations after lower extremity amputation. (Anesth Analg 2010;111:1308-15)
引用
收藏
页码:1308 / 1315
页数:8
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]
PHANTOM LIMB PAIN IN AMPUTEES DURING THE 1ST 12 MONTHS FOLLOWING LIMB AMPUTATION, AFTER PREOPERATIVE LUMBAR EPIDURAL BLOCKADE [J].
BACH, S ;
NORENG, MF ;
TJELLDEN, NU .
PAIN, 1988, 33 (03) :297-301
[2]
Borghi B, 2009, MINERVA ANESTESIOL, V75, P661
[3]
PSOAS COMPARTMENT BLOCK [J].
CHAYEN, D ;
NATHAN, H ;
CHAYEN, M .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1976, 45 (01) :95-99
[4]
Continuous perineural infusions at home: Narrowing the focus [J].
Chelly, JE ;
Williams, BA .
REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2004, 29 (01) :1-3
[5]
A new posterior approach to the sciatic nerve block: A prospective, randomized comparison with the classic posterior approach [J].
de Benedetto, P ;
Bertini, L ;
Casati, A ;
Borghi, B ;
Albertin, A ;
Fanelli, G .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2001, 93 (04) :1040-1044
[6]
Phantom pain and risk factors: A multivariate analysis [J].
Dijkstra, PU ;
Geertzen, JHB ;
Stewart, R ;
van der Schans, CP .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2002, 24 (06) :578-585
[7]
Enneking FK, 1997, REGION ANESTH, V22, P351
[8]
Phantom pain, residual limb pain, and back pain in amputees: Results of a national survey [J].
Ephraim, PL ;
Wegener, ST ;
MacKenzie, EJ ;
Dillingham, TR ;
Pezzin, LE .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2005, 86 (10) :1910-1919
[9]
FISHER A, 1991, ANESTH ANALG, V72, P300
[10]
Gehling M, 2003, SCHMERZ, V17, P11, DOI 10.1007/s00482-002-0198-2