Radiation dose from contemporary cardiothoracic multidetector CT Protocols with an anthropomorphic female phantom: Implications for cancer induction

被引:194
作者
Hurwitz, Lynne M.
Reiman, Robert E.
Yoshizumi, Terry T.
Goodman, Philip C.
Toncheva, Greta
Nguyen, Giao
Lowry, Carolyn
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Ctr Med, Dept Radiol, Durham, NC 27706 USA
[2] Duke Univ Hlth Syst, Radiat Safety Div, Durham, NC 27706 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2453062046
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To measure prospectively and directly both organ dose and effective dose (ED) for adult cardiac and pulmonary computed tomographic (CT) angiography by using current clinical protocols for 64-detector CT in an anthropomorphic female phantom and to estimate lifetime attributable risk of breast and lung cancer incidence on the basis of measured ED and organ dose. Materials and Methods: Cardiac and pulmonary 64-detector CT angiography was performed by using current clinical protocols to evaluate the pulmonary veins (electrocardiographically [ECG] gated, 64 sections at 0.625-mm collimation, 120 kVp, 300 mA, 0.35-second tube rotation), native coronary arteries (ECG gated; 64 sections at 0.625 mm; 120 kVp; maximum current, 500-750 mA; minimum, 100-350 mA; 0.35-second tube rotation) and pulmonary embolus (64 sections at 1.25 mm, 140 kVp, 645 mA, 0.5-second tube rotation). Absorbed organ doses were measured by using an anthropomorphic female phantom and metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor detectors. ED was calculated from measured organ doses and the dose-length product. Results: ED for current adult cardiac and pulmonary 64-detector CT angiography protocols were 12.4-31.8 mSv. Overall, skin, breast, and esophagus and heart had the highest recorded absorbed organ doses. Relative risk for breast cancer incidence for girls and women was 1.004-1.042 for a single examination. Relative risk for lung cancer incidence for men and women was 1.005-1.076 from a single examination. Conclusion: EDs and organ doses from 64-detector CT are higher than those previously reported for adult cardiac and pulmonary CT angiography protocols. Risk for breast and lung cancer induction from these studies is greatest for the younger patient population.
引用
收藏
页码:742 / 750
页数:9
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR VII, phase 2-Committee to Assess Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation
[2]  
Bongartz G.G.S., 1999, EUROPEAN GUIDELINES, V1999, P16262
[3]   Does radiotherapy around the time of pregnancy for Hodgkin's disease modify the risk of breast cancer? [J].
Chen, J ;
Lee, RJ ;
Tsodikov, A ;
Smith, L ;
Gaffney, DK .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 58 (05) :1474-1479
[4]   Pulmonary embolism: Radiation dose with multi-detector row CT and digital angiography for diagnosis [J].
Coche, Emmanuel ;
Vynckier, Stefaan ;
Octave-Prignot, Michelle .
RADIOLOGY, 2006, 240 (03) :690-697
[5]   Comparison of radiation doses from multislice computed tomography coronary angiography and conventional diagnostic angiography [J].
Coles, DR ;
Smail, MA ;
Negus, IS ;
Wilde, P ;
Oberhoff, M ;
Karsch, KR ;
Baumbach, A .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2006, 47 (09) :1840-1845
[6]  
*COMM ASS HLTH RIS, 2006, HLTH RISKS EXP LOW L, P278
[7]  
Committee to Assess Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation National Research Council, 2006, HLTH RISKS EXP LOW L, P311
[8]   ACTIVE BONE-MARROW DISTRIBUTION AS A FUNCTION OF AGE IN HUMANS [J].
CRISTY, M .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1981, 26 (03) :389-400
[9]   COMPARISON OF 2 METHODS FOR ASSESSING PATIENT DOSE FROM COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY [J].
GELEIJNS, J ;
VANUNNIK, JG ;
ZOETELIEF, J ;
ZWEERS, D ;
BROERSE, JJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1994, 67 (796) :360-365
[10]   16-detector multislice CT: dosimetry estimation by TLD measurement compared with Monte Carlo simulation [J].
Groves, AM ;
Owen, KE ;
Courtney, HM ;
Yates, SJ ;
Goldstone, KE ;
Blake, GM ;
Dixon, AK .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2004, 77 (920) :662-665