Differences in receptor binding of LDL subfractions

被引:90
作者
Campos, H
Arnold, KS
Balestra, ME
Innerarity, TL
Krauss, RM
机构
[1] UNIV CALIF BERKELEY,LAWRENCE BERKELEY LAB,DONNER LAB,BERKELEY,CA 94720
[2] ERNEST ORLANDO LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATL LAB,DEPT MOLEC & NUCL MED,DIV LIFE SCI,BERKELEY,CA
[3] UNIV CALIF SAN FRANCISCO,GLADSTONE INST CARDIOVASC DIS,SAN FRANCISCO,CA 94141
关键词
LDL subclasses; LDL size; apoE; LDL receptor; cholesterol;
D O I
10.1161/01.ATV.16.6.794
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Differences in low density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor-binding affinity among LDL particles of different size were examined in competitive binding assays in human skin fibroblasts and LDL (d = 1.020 to 1.050 g/mL) from subjects with a predominance of large (greater than or equal to 272 Angstrom), medium (259 to 271 Angstrom), and small (less than or equal to 257 Angstrom) LDL. Among 57 normolipidemic subjects with LDL cholesterol (-C) levels <160 mg/dL, binding affinity was reduced by 16% in those with predominantly large LDL and by 14% in those with small LDL compared with most subjects who had a predominance of medium-size LDL and in all LDL size subgroups in 66 subjects with LDL-C greater than or equal to 160 mg/dL. Differences in LDL receptor-binding affinity were further 1.032 g/mL; II, d = 1.032 to 1.038 g/mL; and III, d = 1.038 to 1.050 g/mL) from three subjects with predominantly large (pattern A) and small (pattern B) LDL particles. The binding affinity (K-d) of LDL-II was similar for patterns A and B (9.2+/-1.4 and 9.4+/-0.7, respectively) and 30% lower in LDL-II from both groups (P<.05). The binding affinity of LDL-I in pattern A (12.6+/-1.5 mu g/mg) was lower (P<0.5) than that in LDL-II and LDL-I from pattern B (8.0+/-2.4 mu g/mg). After incubation with a monoclonal antibody that specifically blocked the LDL receptor-binding domain of apoE, LDL-I from two pattern B subjects showed substantially lower binding affinity (K-d=20.0 and 19.2 mu g/mg) than in pattern A (K-d=13.2 and 14.2 mu g/mg), a result consistent with our finding of a higher apoE content in pattern B LDL-I (P<.001). Thus, factors associated with variations in particle size and apoE content in LDL subclasses in normolipidemic subjects contribute to the differences in LDL receptor binding that may results in differing metabolic behavior in vivo.
引用
收藏
页码:794 / 801
页数:8
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
ARNOLD KS, 1991, LIPOPROTEIN ANAL PRA, P145
[2]  
AUSTIN MA, 1988, AM J HUM GENET, V43, P838
[3]   INHERITANCE OF LOW-DENSITY-LIPOPROTEIN SUBCLASS PATTERNS IN FAMILIAL COMBINED HYPERLIPIDEMIA [J].
AUSTIN, MA ;
BRUNZELL, JD ;
FITCH, WL ;
KRAUSS, RM .
ARTERIOSCLEROSIS, 1990, 10 (04) :520-530
[4]  
AUSTIN MA, 1988, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V260, P1917
[5]   ATHEROGENIC LIPOPROTEIN PHENOTYPE - A PROPOSED GENETIC-MARKER FOR CORONARY HEART-DISEASE RISK [J].
AUSTIN, MA ;
KING, MC ;
VRANIZAN, KM ;
KRAUSS, RM .
CIRCULATION, 1990, 82 (02) :495-506
[6]   LOW-DENSITY-LIPOPROTEIN PARTICLE-SIZE AND CORONARY-ARTERY DISEASE [J].
CAMPOS, H ;
GENEST, JJ ;
BLIJLEVENS, E ;
MCNAMARA, JR ;
JENNER, JL ;
ORDOVAS, JM ;
WILSON, PWF ;
SCHAEFER, EJ .
ARTERIOSCLEROSIS AND THROMBOSIS, 1992, 12 (02) :187-195
[7]   LDL PARTICLE-SIZE DISTRIBUTION - RESULTS FROM THE FRAMINGHAM OFFSPRING STUDY [J].
CAMPOS, H ;
BLIJLEVENS, E ;
MCNAMARA, JR ;
ORDOVAS, JM ;
POSNER, BM ;
WILSON, PWF ;
CASTELLI, WP ;
SCHAEFER, EJ .
ARTERIOSCLEROSIS AND THROMBOSIS, 1992, 12 (12) :1410-1419
[8]  
CHAPPELL DA, 1991, J BIOL CHEM, V266, P19296
[9]   LOW-DENSITY-LIPOPROTEIN SUBCLASS PATTERNS AND LIPOPROTEIN RESPONSE TO A REDUCED-FAT DIET IN MEN [J].
DREON, DM ;
FERNSTROM, HA ;
MILLER, B ;
KRAUSS, RM .
FASEB JOURNAL, 1994, 8 (01) :121-126
[10]   INFLUENCE OF AGE ON THE METABOLISM OF PLASMA LOW-DENSITY LIPOPROTEINS IN HEALTHY-MALES [J].
ERICSSON, S ;
ERIKSSON, M ;
VITOLS, S ;
EINARSSON, K ;
BERGLUND, L ;
ANGELIN, B .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 1991, 87 (02) :591-596