Mutualistic benefits generate an unequal distribution of risky activities among unrelated group members

被引:54
作者
Kukuk, PF [1 ]
Ward, SA
Jozwiak, A
机构
[1] Univ Montana, Div Biol Sci, Missoula, MT 59012 USA
[2] La Trobe Univ, Sch Genet & Human Variat, Bundoora, Vic 3083, Australia
[3] La Trobe Univ, Sch Zool, Bundoora, Vic 3083, Australia
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s001140050528
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Recent studies provide a new challenge to the adequacy of theories concerning the evolution of cooperation among nonrelatives: some individuals perform high-risk activities while others do not. We examined a communal hymenopteran species, Lasioglossum (Chilalictus) hemichalceum, to determine why group members engaged in demonstrably risky activities (foraging) tolerate the selfish behavior (remaining in the nest) of unrelated nestmates. Experimental removal of adult females indicated that their presence is required for the protection of brood from ant predators. Nonforagers ensure the continued presence of adults in the nest if the risk-taking foragers die, thereby safeguarding the survival of forager offspring. This results in an unequal distribution of risky activities within social groups in which avoidance of risky activities by some group members is ultimately beneficial to risk takers.
引用
收藏
页码:445 / 449
页数:5
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
ABRAHAM AK, 1981, TIBS, V28, P106
[2]  
ANDERSON M, 1985, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V15, P165
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1974, SOCIAL BEHAV BEES CO
[4]   THE EVOLUTION OF COOPERATION [J].
AXELROD, R ;
HAMILTON, WD .
SCIENCE, 1981, 211 (4489) :1390-1396
[5]   BALANCING FORAGING AND ANTIPREDATOR DEMANDS - AN ADVANTAGE OF SOCIALITY [J].
CLARK, CW ;
DUKAS, R .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1994, 144 (03) :542-548
[6]   PUNISHMENT IN ANIMAL SOCIETIES [J].
CLUTTONBROCK, TH ;
PARKER, GA .
NATURE, 1995, 373 (6511) :209-216
[7]   ALTRUISM AMONG NON-RELATIVES - ALTERNATIVES TO THE PRISONERS-DILEMMA [J].
CONNOR, RC .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 1995, 10 (02) :84-86
[8]  
Crespi Bernard J., 1992, P176
[9]  
Danforth BN, 1996, EVOLUTION, V50, P276, DOI [10.2307/2410799, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb04491.x]
[10]  
EICKWORT GC, 1981, SOCIAL INSECTS, V2, P199