The prognostic value of PET and PET/CT in cervical cancer

被引:66
作者
Grigsby, Perry W. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[2] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Div Nucl Med, Mallinckrodt Inst Radiol, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[3] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Gynecol Oncol, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
关键词
Cervix cancer; Diagnosis; FDG-PET/CT; Prognosis; Radiation;
D O I
10.1102/1470-7330.2008.0022
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
Cervical cancer ranks among the top three cancer diagnoses in women worldwide. In the United States, the SEER Cancer Statistics Review identified cervical cancer as the third leading cause (following childhood cancers and testicular cancer) of average years of life lost per person dying of cancer for all races and both genders. Approximately one-third of cervical cancer patients develop disease recurrence and the majority of these recurrences occur within the first 2 years after completion of therapy. Predictors of disease recurrence include stage and lymph node status at the time of initial diagnosis. The initial diagnosis and staging of cervical cancer has traditionally been achieved by history and physical examination and by use of selected imaging studies. Accurate staging is important both for selecting appropriate therapy and for prognosis. Computed tomography (CT) has-been the most widely used imaging method for assessment of nodal involvement and detection of distant metastatic disease. Positron emission tomography (PET) has become established imaging tool for cervical cancer. The functional information about regional glucose metabolism provided by fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET provide for greater sensitivity and specificity in most cancer imaging applications by comparison with CT and other anatomic imaging methods. PET is superior to conventional imaging modalities for evaluating patients with cervical cancer. © 2008 International Cancer Imaging Society.
引用
收藏
页码:146 / 155
页数:10
相关论文
共 86 条
[1]
Ellenson L.H., Wu T.C., Focus on endometrial and cervical cancer, Cancer Cell, 5, pp. 533-538, (2004)
[2]
Plummer M., Franceschi S., Strategies for HPV prevention, Virus Res, 89, pp. 285-293, (2002)
[3]
Belhocine T., Thille A., Fridman V., Et al., Contribution of whole-body <sup>18</sup>FDG PET imaging in the management of cervical cancer, Gynecol Oncol, 87, pp. 90-97, (2002)
[4]
Reinhardt M.J., Ehritt-Braun C., Vagelgesang D., Et al., Metastatic lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer detection with MR imaging and FDG PET, Radiology, 218, pp. 776-782, (2001)
[5]
Havrilesky L.J., Kulasingam S.L., Matchar D.B., Myers E.R., FDG-PET for management of cervical and ovarian cancer, Gynecol Oncol, 97, pp. 183-191, (2005)
[6]
Rose P.G., Adler L.P., Rodriguez M., Faulhaber P.F., Abdul-Karim F.W., Miraldi F., Positron emission tomography for evaluating para-aortic nodal metastasis in locally advanced cervical cancer before surgical staging: A surgicopathologic study, J Clin Oncol, 17, pp. 41-45, (1999)
[7]
Yeh L.S., Hung Y.C., Shen Y.Y., Kao C.H., Lin C.C., Lee C.C., Detecting para-aortic lymph noda metastasis by positron emission tomography of <sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose in advanced cervical cancer with negative magnetic resonance imaging findings, Oncol Rep, 9, pp. 1289-1292, (2002)
[8]
Sugawara Y., Eisbruch A., Kosuda S., Recker B.E., Kison P.V., Wahl R.L., Evaluation of FDG PET in patients with cervical cancer, J Nucl Med, 40, pp. 1125-1131, (1999)
[9]
Lin W.C., Hung Y.C., Yeh L.S., Kao C.H., Yen R.F., Shen Y.Y., Usefulness of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to detect para-aortic lymph nodal metastasis in advanced cervical cancer with negative computed tomography findings, Gynecol Oncol, 89, pp. 73-76, (2003)
[10]
Grigsby P.W., Dehdashti F., Siegel B.A., FDG-PET evaluation of carcinoma of the cervix, Clin Positron Imaging, 2, pp. 105-109, (1999)