Addressing the inverse care law in cardiac services

被引:16
作者
Langham, S
Basnett, I
McCartney, P
Normand, C
Pickering, J
Sheers, D
Thorogood, M
机构
[1] Camden Primary Care Trust, London NW1 2LJ, England
[2] Univ London London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, London WC1E 7HT, England
[3] St Peters St Med Practice, London N1 8JG, England
[4] Islington Primary Care Trust, London NW1 2LJ, England
[5] Univ Warwick, Sch Med, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England
来源
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MEDICINE | 2003年 / 25卷 / 03期
关键词
revascularization rates; inequity; National Service Framework; coronary heart disease;
D O I
10.1093/pubmed/fdg054
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Wide variation in rates of angiography and revascularization exist that are not explained by the level of need for these services. The National Service Framework for Coronary Heart Disease has set out a number of standards with the aim of increasing the number of revascularizations and reducing inequalities in access to care. In this study we aimed to investigate inequity in angiography and revascularization rates between the four Primary Care Group (PCG) areas in Camden and Islington Health Authority and to put in place measures to address the problems identified. Methods Routinely available data were collected on all residents within Camden and Islington Health Authority undergoing angiography, angioplasty (PTCA) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) between 1997 and 2001. These were used to calculate intervention rates per million population for each of the three procedures within each PCG. Semi-structured interviews were carried out with a sample of clinicians to explore their views on the provision of revascularization services within the Health Authority. Results Angiography and revascularization rates varied widely between the four PCGs. In 2001 there was a two-fold difference for angiography and CABG and a 3.5-fold difference for PTCA. The variations were not explained by a measure of the level of need for these services. The highest rates were in the area with the lowest standardized mortality ratio for coronary heart disease. The interviews identified a number of possible explanations for the variations that related to differences in clinical behaviour at the consultant level and barriers in access to interventional cardiology and cardiac services. Following this research, a further interventional cardiologist appointment is planned, joint protocols of care are being established and barriers to access are being addressed. Conclusions The new strategic health authorities should make it a priority to assess inequity in the provision of services within their areas, investigate the possible causes and support the primary care trusts to implement plans to address them.
引用
收藏
页码:202 / 207
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   CORONARY REVASCULARIZATION - WHY DO RATES VARY GEOGRAPHICALLY IN THE UK [J].
BLACK, N ;
LANGHAM, S ;
PETTICREW, M .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 1995, 49 (04) :408-412
[2]   Impact of the 1991 NHS reforms on the availability and use of coronary revascularisation in the UK (1987-1995) [J].
Black, N ;
Langham, S ;
Coshall, C ;
Parker, J .
HEART, 1996, 76 (04) :1-31
[3]  
Chapple A, 1998, J Health Serv Res Policy, V3, P153
[4]  
*DEP HLTH, 2000, NAT SERV FRAM COR HE, pCH5
[5]   Barriers to referral in patients with angina: qualitative study [J].
Gardner, K ;
Chapple, A .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 319 (7207) :418-421
[6]   INVERSE CARE LAW [J].
HART, JT .
LANCET, 1971, 1 (7696) :405-+
[7]   Hypothetical ratings of coronary angiography appropriateness: are they associated with actual angiographic findings, mortality, and revascularisation rate? The ACRE study [J].
Hemingway, H ;
Crook, AM ;
Banerjee, S ;
Dawson, JR ;
Feder, G ;
Magee, PG ;
Wood, A ;
Philpott, S ;
Timmis, A .
HEART, 2001, 85 (06) :672-679
[8]   Underuse of coronary revascularization procedures in patients considered appropriate candidates for revascularization. [J].
Hemingway, H ;
Crook, AM ;
Feder, G ;
Banerjee, S ;
Dawson, JR ;
Magee, P ;
Philpott, S ;
Sanders, J ;
Wood, A ;
Timmis, AD .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 344 (09) :645-654
[9]  
Hippisley-Cox J, 2000, BRIT J GEN PRACT, V50, P449
[10]   Evolution of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in Europe from 1992-1996 [J].
Maier, W ;
Windecker, S ;
Boersma, E ;
Meier, B .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2001, 22 (18) :1733-1740