Multisensor image recognition by neural networks with understandable behavior

被引:19
作者
Roli, F [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV CAGLIARI, DEPT ELECT & ELECT ENGN, I-09123 CAGLIARI, ITALY
关键词
multisensor image recognition; artificial neural networks; interpretation of the network behavior; combination of multiple classifiers; remote sensing;
D O I
10.1142/S0218001496000517
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Recently, a kind of structured neural networks (SNNs) explicitly devoted to multisensor image recognition and aimed at allowing the interpretation of the ''network behavior'' was presented in Ref. 1. Experiments reported in Ref. 1 pointed out that SNNs provide a trade-off between recognition accuracy and interpretation of the network behavior. In this paper, the combination of multiple SNNs, each of which has been trained on the same data set, is proposed as a means to improve recognition results, while keeping the possibility of interpreting the network behavior. A simple method for interpreting the ''collective behaviors'' of such SNN ensembles is described. Such an interpretation method can be used to understand the different kinds of ''solutions'' learned by the SNNs belonging to an ensemble. In addition, as compared with the interpretation method presented in Ref. 1, it is shown that the knowledge embodied in an SNN can be translated into a set of understandable ''recognition rules''. Experimental results on the recognition of multisensor remote-sensing images (optical and radar images) are reported in terms of both recognition accuracy and network-behavior interpretation. An additional experiment on a multisource remote-sensing data set is described to show that SNNs can also be effectively used for multisource recognition tasks.
引用
收藏
页码:887 / 917
页数:31
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Ash T., 1989, Connection Science, V1, P365, DOI 10.1080/09540098908915647
[2]   DEMOCRACY IN NEURAL NETS - VOTING SCHEMES FOR CLASSIFICATION [J].
BATTITI, R ;
COLLA, AM .
NEURAL NETWORKS, 1994, 7 (04) :691-707
[3]   What Size Net Gives Valid Generalization? [J].
Baum, Eric B. ;
Haussler, David .
NEURAL COMPUTATION, 1989, 1 (01) :151-160
[4]   NEURAL NETWORK APPROACHES VERSUS STATISTICAL-METHODS IN CLASSIFICATION OF MULTISOURCE REMOTE-SENSING DATA [J].
BENEDIKTSSON, JA ;
SWAIN, PH ;
ERSOY, OK .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 1990, 28 (04) :540-552
[5]  
BISCHOF H, 1992, 11TH IAPR INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PATTERN RECOGNITION, PROCEEDINGS, VOL II, P581, DOI 10.1109/ICPR.1992.201845
[6]  
BRUZZONE L, 1996, IN PRESS INT J PHOTO
[7]   A MACHINE LEARNING-METHOD FOR GENERATION OF A NEURAL NETWORK ARCHITECTURE - A CONTINUOUS ID3 ALGORITHM [J].
CIOS, KJ ;
LIU, N .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL NETWORKS, 1992, 3 (02) :280-291
[8]  
Dasarathy B.V., 1994, DECISION FUSION
[9]  
Duda R. O., 1973, PATTERN CLASSIFICATI, V3
[10]  
FAHLMAN SE, 1990, CMUCS90100 CARN MELL, P1