What properties of grid energy storage are most valuable?

被引:78
作者
Hittinger, Eric [1 ]
Whitacre, J. F. [1 ,2 ]
Apt, Jay [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Engn & Publ Policy, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Mat Sci & Engn, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[3] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Tepper Sch Business, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Energy storage; Sensitivity analysis; Frequency regulation; Peak shaving; Wind integration; Capital cost; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.12.003
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
While energy storage technologies have existed for decades, fast-ramping grid-level storage is still an immature industry and is experiencing relatively rapid improvements in performance and cost across a variety of technologies. In this innovation cycle, it is important to determine which properties of emerging energy storage technologies are most valuable. Decreased capital cost, increased power capability, and increased efficiency all would improve the value of an energy storage technology and each has cost implications that vary by application, but there has not yet been an investigation of the marginal rate of technical substitution between storage properties. We use engineering-economic models of four emerging fast-ramping energy storage technologies and examine their cost-effectiveness for four realistic current applications. We determine which properties have the greatest effect on cost-of-service by performing an extended sensitivity analysis on the storage properties for combinations of application and storage type. We find that capital cost of storage is consistently important, and identify applications for which power/energy limitations are important. Each combination is different and blanket statements are not always appropriate. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:436 / 449
页数:14
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, CHARACTERISTICS TECH
[2]   New technology and possible advances in energy storage [J].
Baker, John .
ENERGY POLICY, 2008, 36 (12) :4368-4373
[3]  
Beacon Power, 2011, BEAC POW SMART EN 25
[4]  
Bonneville Power Administration, 2009, DAT BPA BAL AUTH TOT
[5]  
Bradbury D., 2011, BEACON POWER SPINS W
[6]  
Butler P., 2002, ENERGY STORAGE OPPOR
[7]  
Electric Power Research Institute, 2010, EL EN STOR TECHN OPT
[8]  
EPRI-DOE, 2002, EPRI DOE HDB EN STOR
[9]  
Eyer J., 2009, ELECT UTILITY TRANSM
[10]  
Eyer J M, 2011, ENERGY STORAGE ELECT