Measurement and reproducibility of magnetocardiographic filtered atrial signal in patients with paroxysmal lone atrial fibrillation and in healthy subjects

被引:13
作者
Koskinen, R
Lehto, M
Väänänen, H
Rantonen, J
Voipio-Pulkki, LM
Mäkijärvi, M
Lehtonen, L
Montonen, J
Toivonen, L
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Cent Hosp, Div Cardiol, FI-00029 Helsinki, Finland
[2] Univ Helsinki, Cent Hosp, BioMag Lab, FI-00029 Helsinki, Finland
[3] Univ Helsinki, Cent Hosp, Dept Clin Pharmacol, FI-00029 Helsinki, Finland
[4] Univ Helsinki, Cent Hosp, Dept Internal Med, FI-00029 Helsinki, Finland
[5] Helsinki Univ Technol, Biomed Engn Lab, Espoo 02015, Finland
关键词
magnetocardiography; signal-averaged electrocardiography; reproducibility; atrium; atrial fibrillation;
D O I
10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2005.03.012
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Magnetocardiography (MCG) is a method complementary to electrocardiography (ECG). We examined recording and reproducibility of atrial depolarization signal by MCG. Multichannel MCG over anterior chest and orthogonal 3-lead ECG were recorded in 9 patients who had paroxysmal lone atrial fibrillation and in 10 healthy subjects in duplicate at least I week apart. Data were averaged using atrial wave template and high-pass filtered at 25, 40, and 60 Hz. Atrial signal duration with automatic detection of onset and offset and root mean square amplitudes of the last portion of atrial signal were determined. Coefficient of variation of atrial signal duration by MCG at 40 Hz was 3.3% and difference between the measurements was 3.5 milliseconds on average. The corresponding figures obtained by signal-averaged ECG (SAECG) were 6.1% and 6.9 milliseconds. Coefficient of variation for root mean square of the last 40 milliseconds of atrial signal were 16% in MCG and 17% in SAECG. Reproducibility was best at 40-Hz filter and similar in patients and healthy subjects. In conclusion, the reproducibility of atrial signal variables in MCG is adequate and somewhat better than in SAECG and equal in patients with lone atrial fibrillation and healthy subjects. Magnetocardiography seems to be a potentially valuable method to evaluate features of atrial depolarization in patient studies. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:330 / 336
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   MAGNETIC HEART VECTOR [J].
BAULE, GM ;
MCFEE, R .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1970, 79 (02) :223-+
[2]   Measurement error [J].
Bland, JM ;
Altman, DG .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 312 (7047) :1654-1654
[3]   THE ASSESSMENT OF METHODS OF MEASUREMENT [J].
CHINN, S .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1990, 9 (04) :351-362
[4]   Within- and between-patient variation of the signal-averaged P wave in coronary artery disease [J].
Christiansen, EH ;
Frost, L ;
Pilegaard, H ;
ToftegaardNielsen, T ;
Pedersen, AK .
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1996, 19 (01) :72-81
[5]   P wave signal-averaged electrocardiography to identify risk for atrial fibrillation [J].
Darbar, D ;
Jahangir, A ;
Hammill, SC ;
Gersh, BJ .
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 25 (10) :1447-1453
[6]   P-wave signal-averaging: normal values and reproducibility [J].
Ehrlich, JR ;
Zhang, GQ ;
Israel, CW ;
Hohnloser, SH .
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR KARDIOLOGIE, 2001, 90 (03) :170-176
[7]   REPRODUCIBILITY OF THE SIGNAL-AVERAGED ELECTROCARDIOGRAM [J].
ENGEL, TR ;
PIERCE, DL ;
PATIL, KD .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1991, 122 (06) :1652-1660
[8]   AN ACCURATE, CLINICALLY PRACTICAL SYSTEM FOR SPATIAL VECTORCARDIOGRAPHY [J].
FRANK, E .
CIRCULATION, 1956, 13 (05) :737-749
[9]   DETECTION OF PATIENTS AT RISK FOR PAROXYSMAL ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION DURING SINUS RHYTHM BY P-WAVE TRIGGERED SIGNAL-AVERAGED ELECTROCARDIOGRAM [J].
FUKUNAMI, M ;
YAMADA, T ;
OHMORI, M ;
KUMAGAI, K ;
UMEMOTO, K ;
SAKAI, A ;
KONDOH, N ;
MINAMINO, T ;
HOKI, N .
CIRCULATION, 1991, 83 (01) :162-169
[10]   OPTIMAL BANDPASS-FILTERS FOR TIME-DOMAIN ANALYSIS OF THE SIGNAL-AVERAGED ELECTROCARDIOGRAM [J].
GOMES, JA ;
WINTERS, SL ;
STEWART, D ;
TARGONSKI, A ;
BARRECA, P .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1987, 60 (16) :1290-1298