We said, she said: A response to Loftus (2003)

被引:3
作者
Porter, S [1 ]
Campbell, M [1 ]
Birt, AR [1 ]
Woodworth, MT [1 ]
机构
[1] Dalhousie Univ, Halifax, NS B3H 3J5, Canada
来源
CANADIAN PSYCHOLOGY-PSYCHOLOGIE CANADIENNE | 2003年 / 44卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1037/h0086941
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In Loftus' (included in this issue) commentary on our article, she agreed with many of our conclusions concerning allegations in "he said, she said" legal cases. However, she focused some criticism on our coverage of recovered memory evidence. It appears that the main difference in our perspectives was not related to the science of memory but rather was one of scientific education versus advocacy in the legal system.
引用
收藏
页码:213 / 215
页数:3
相关论文
共 3 条
[1]   Memory in Canadian courts of law [J].
Loftus, EF .
CANADIAN PSYCHOLOGY-PSYCHOLOGIE CANADIENNE, 2003, 44 (03) :207-212
[2]   Is traumatic memory special?: A comparison of traumatic memory characteristics with memory for other emotional life experiences [J].
Porter, S ;
Birt, AR .
APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 15 (07) :S101-S117
[3]   Memory for murder -: A psychological perspective on dissociative amnesia in legal contexts [J].
Porter, S ;
Birt, AR ;
Yuille, JC ;
Hervé, HF .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LAW AND PSYCHIATRY, 2001, 24 (01) :23-42