Test-retest reliability of the Isernhagen Work Systems Functional Capacity Evaluation in patients with chronic low back pain

被引:87
作者
Brouwer, S
Reneman, MF
Dijkstra, PU
Groothoff, JW
Schellekens, JMH
Göeken, LNH
机构
[1] Univ Groningen Hosp, Ctr Rehabil, NL-9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen Hosp, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, NL-9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Groningen, No Ctr Hlth Care Res, NL-9700 AB Groningen, Netherlands
[4] Univ Groningen, Dept Expt & Occupat Psychol, NL-9700 AB Groningen, Netherlands
[5] Univ Groningen, Inst Movement Sci, NL-9700 AB Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
reliability; chronic low back pain; functional capacity evaluation; disability assessment; work;
D O I
10.1023/A:1026264519996
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to investigate test-retest reliability of the Isernhagen Work System Functional Capacity Evaluation (IWS FCE) in a sample of patients (n=30) suffering from Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP) and selected for rehabilitation treatment. The IWS FCE consists of 28 tests that reflect work-related activities like lifting, carrying, bending, etc. In this study, a slightly modified IWS FCE was used. Patients were included in the study if they were still at work or were less than 1 year out of work because of CLBP. Participants' mean age was 40 years, the duration of low back pain ranged between 5 and 10 years. Fifteen patients (50%) were out of work for a mean of 17 weeks, and they all received financial compensation. Two FCE sessions were held with a 2-week interval in between. Means per session, 95% confidence intervals of the mean difference, one-way random Intra Class Correlations (ICC), limits of agreement, Cohen's kappa and percentage of absolute agreement were calculated where appropriate. An ICC of 0.75 or more, a kappa value of more than 0.60 and a percentage of absolute agreement of 80% were considered as an acceptable reliability. Tests of the IWC FCE were divided into tests with and tests without an acceptable test-retest reliability on the basis of the kappa values, the percentage of absolute agreement and the ICC values. Fifteen tests (79%) showed an acceptable test-retest reliability based on Kappa values and percentage of absolute agreement. Eleven tests (61%) showed an acceptable test-retest reliability based on ICC values.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 218
页数:12
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
ABDELMOTY E, 1993, CLIN J PAIN, V9, P2003
[2]  
Altman D, 1991, PRACTICAL STAT MED R, P404
[3]  
Altman DG, 1990, PRACTICAL STAT MED R
[4]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[5]   DETERMINING THE GENERALIZABILITY OF RATING-SCALES IN CLINICAL SETTINGS [J].
EVANS, WJ ;
CAYTEN, CG ;
GREEN, PA .
MEDICAL CARE, 1981, 19 (12) :1211-1220
[6]   Reliability of safe maximum lifting determinations of a functional capacity evaluation [J].
Gross, DP ;
Battié, MC .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2002, 82 (04) :364-371
[7]  
HAAS M, 1991, J MANIP PHYSIOL THER, V14, P119
[8]  
HART DL, 1988, PHYS THER, V68, P824
[9]  
Innes Ev, 1999, Work, V13, P107
[10]  
*IS WORK SYST, 1987, FUNCT CAP PROC MAN