Anniversary paper: Evaluation of medical imaging systems

被引:44
作者
Krupinski, Elizabeth A. [1 ]
Jiang, Yulei
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Dept Radiol, Tucson, AZ 85724 USA
关键词
system evaluation; medical imaging; receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis; diagnostic accuracy; observer study; workflow efficiency;
D O I
10.1118/1.2830376
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Medical imaging used to be primarily within the domain of radiology, but with the advent of virtual pathology slides and telemedicine, imaging technology is expanding in the healthcare enterprise. As new imaging technologies are developed, they must be evaluated to assess the impact and benefit on patient care. The authors review the hierarchical model of the efficacy of diagnostic imaging systems by Fryback and Thornbury [Med. Decis. Making 11, 88-94 (1991)] as a guiding principle for system evaluation. Evaluation of medical imaging systems encompasses everything from the hardware and software used to acquire, store, and transmit images to the presentation of images to the interpreting clinician. Evaluation of medical imaging systems can take many forms, from the purely technical (e.g., patient dose measurement) to the increasingly complex (e.g., determining whether a new imaging method saves lives and benefits society). Evaluation methodologies cover a broad range, from receiver operating characteristic (ROC) techniques that measure diagnostic accuracy to timing studies that measure image-interpretation workflow efficiency. The authors review briefly the history of the development of evaluation methodologies and review ROC methodology as well as other types of evaluation methods. They discuss unique challenges in system evaluation that face the imaging community today and opportunities for future advances. (C) 2008 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:645 / 659
页数:15
相关论文
共 200 条
[1]  
*ACR, 2004, BREAST IM REP DAT SY, P195
[2]  
ACR, 2004, BREAST IM REP DAT SY
[3]   Use of computer-aided detection (CAD) tools in screening mammography: a multidisciplinary investigation [J].
Alberdi, E ;
Povyakalo, AA ;
Strigini, L ;
Ayton, P ;
Hartswood, M ;
Procter, R ;
Slack, R .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2005, 78 :S31-S40
[4]   Prostate cancer screening in the prostate, lung, colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial: Findings from the initial screening round of a randomized trial [J].
Andriole, GL ;
Levin, DL ;
Crawford, ED ;
Gelmann, ER ;
Pinsky, PF ;
Chia, D ;
Kramer, BS ;
Reding, D ;
Church, TR ;
Grubb, RL ;
Izmirlian, G ;
Ragard, LR ;
Clapp, JD ;
Prorok, PC ;
Gohagan, JK .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2005, 97 (06) :433-438
[5]  
[Anonymous], HDB MED IMAGING
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1950, STAT DECISION FUNCTI
[7]   Effect of an artificial neural network on radiologists' performance in the differential diagnosis of interstitial lung disease using chest radiographs [J].
Ashizawa, K ;
MacMahon, H ;
Ishida, T ;
Nakamura, K ;
Vyborny, CJ ;
Katsuragawa, S ;
Doi, K .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1999, 172 (05) :1311-1315
[8]   Pulmonary nodules: Estimation of malignancy at thin-section helical CT - Effect of computer-aided diagnosis on performance of radiologists [J].
Awai, K ;
Murao, K ;
Ozawa, A ;
Nakayama, Y ;
Nakaura, T ;
Liu, D ;
Kawanaka, K ;
Funama, Y ;
Morishita, S ;
Yamashita, Y .
RADIOLOGY, 2006, 239 (01) :276-284
[9]   Computed tomography screening and lung cancer outcomes [J].
Bach, Peter B. ;
Jett, James R. ;
Pastorino, Ugo ;
Tockman, Melvyn S. ;
Swensen, Stephen J. ;
Begg, Colin B. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2007, 297 (09) :953-961
[10]  
BAK PRG, 2006, SCAR NEWS, V18, P1