Social security, the family, and economic growth

被引:37
作者
Ehrlich, I [1 ]
Lui, FT
机构
[1] SUNY Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA
[2] Hong Kong Univ Sci & Technol, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1465-7295.1998.tb01722.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We show that a defined-benefits PAYG social security system distorts key family-based choices that affect economic growth. We identify human capital as the engine of growth, and the motivating forces linking the family's overlapping generations as mutually productive intergenerational transfers and/or altruism. The PAYG system is shown to affect adversely at least one of three determinants of the economy's growth path: fertility, savings, and investment in human capital. The specific effects may vary over different stages of economic development. The growth rate is expected to fall in advanced economies. Our analysis indicates that the effect mall be sizeable. (JEL 915, 111, 850).
引用
收藏
页码:390 / 409
页数:20
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], DEM YB
[2]  
Barro R., 1978, IMPACT SOCIAL SECURI
[3]   FERTILITY CHOICE IN A MODEL OF ECONOMIC-GROWTH [J].
BARRO, RJ ;
BECKER, GS .
ECONOMETRICA, 1989, 57 (02) :481-501
[4]   NOBEL LECTURE - THE ECONOMIC WAY OF LOOKING AT BEHAVIOR [J].
BECKER, GS .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1993, 101 (03) :385-409
[5]   HUMAN-CAPITAL, FERTILITY, AND ECONOMIC-GROWTH [J].
BECKER, GS ;
MURPHY, KM ;
TAMURA, R .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1990, 98 (05) :S12-S37
[6]   A REFORMULATION OF THE ECONOMIC-THEORY OF FERTILITY [J].
BECKER, GS ;
BARRO, RJ .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1988, 103 (01) :1-25
[7]  
CHAKRABARTI S, 1993, AM ECON REV, V83, P994
[8]   MARKET INSURANCE, SELF-INSURANCE, AND SELF-PROTECTION [J].
EHRLICH, I ;
BECKER, GS .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1972, 80 (04) :623-648
[9]   INTERGENERATIONAL TRADE, LONGEVITY, AND ECONOMIC-GROWTH [J].
EHRLICH, I ;
LUI, FT .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1991, 99 (05) :1029-1059
[10]   SOCIAL SECURITY, INDUCED RETIREMENT, AND AGGREGATE CAPITAL ACCUMULATION [J].
FELDSTEIN, M .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1974, 82 (05) :905-926