Cortical inhibition in Parkinson's disease - A study with paired magnetic stimulation

被引:213
作者
Berardelli, A
Rona, S
Inghilleri, M
Manfredi, M
机构
[1] Dipartimento di Scienze Neurologiche, 00185 Roma
关键词
motor cortex; magnetic stimulation; cortical inhibition; Parkinson's disease; dopaminergic system;
D O I
10.1093/brain/119.1.71
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
The activity of motor cortical inhibitory circuits was studied with paired transcranial magnetic stimuli in 16 patients with Parkinson's disease 'off' therapy, jive patients 'off' and 'on' therapy, and 11 normal subjects. paired stimuli were delivered at short (3-20 ms) as well as long (100-250 ms) intervals during slight voluntary contraction. The intensity of the conditioning stimulus was subthreshold (80%) at short, and suprathreshold (150%) at long intervals. In addition, the silent period following a single magnetic shock given at 150% of threshold was measured With short interstimulus intervals, no significant difference between patients and normal subjects could be detected With long interstimulus intervals, the test response was significantly move inhibited in patients than in normal subjects. Although the cortical silent period was found to be slightly shorter the recovery of motor evoked potentials was incomplete in patients with Parkinson's disease. This alteration could be partially reverted by dopaminergic therapy. In conclusion, the responsiveness of motor cortices to suprathreshold magnetic stimuli delivered after the end of the silent period is impaired in patients with Parkinson's disease, possibly due to prolonged activity in intracortical inhibitory circuits. The positive effect of L-dopa suggests that dopaminergic modulation of cortical activity, most probably at basal ganglia level, is involved in the pathogenesis of this phenomenon.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 77
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   FUNCTIONAL ARCHITECTURE OF BASAL GANGLIA CIRCUITS - NEURAL SUBSTRATES OF PARALLEL PROCESSING [J].
ALEXANDER, GE ;
CRUTCHER, MD .
TRENDS IN NEUROSCIENCES, 1990, 13 (07) :266-271
[2]  
ALEXANDER GE, 1990, TRENDS NEUROSCI, V14, P55
[3]  
BAKER SN, 1994, EXP BRAIN RES, V99, P529
[4]  
Baldissera F, 1981, HDB PHYSL 1 1, VII, P509, DOI DOI 10.1002/CPHY.CP010212
[5]  
BERARDELLI A, 1994, EXP BRAIN RES, V98, P501
[6]   DESCENDING VOLLEY AFTER ELECTRICAL AND MAGNETIC TRANSCRANIAL STIMULATION IN MAN [J].
BERARDELLI, A ;
INGHILLERI, M ;
CRUCCU, G ;
MANFREDI, M .
NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 1990, 112 (01) :54-58
[7]   PHYSIOLOGICAL-MECHANISMS OF RIGIDITY IN PARKINSONS-DISEASE [J].
BERARDELLI, A ;
SABRA, AF ;
HALLETT, M .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 1983, 46 (01) :45-53
[8]   RESPONSES OF SINGLE SPINAL MOTONEURONS TO MAGNETIC BRAIN-STIMULATION IN HEALTHY-SUBJECTS AND PATIENTS WITH MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS [J].
BONIFACE, SJ ;
MILLS, KR ;
SCHUBERT, M .
BRAIN, 1991, 114 :643-662
[9]   DIRECT COMPARISON OF CORTICOSPINAL VOLLEYS IN HUMAN-SUBJECTS TO TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC AND ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION [J].
BURKE, D ;
HICKS, R ;
GANDEVIA, SC ;
STEPHEN, J ;
WOODFORTH, I ;
CRAWFORD, M .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1993, 470 :383-393
[10]  
BURKE D, 1994, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V476, P553