Ambiguity: the challenge of knowing and deciding together

被引:160
作者
Brugnach, M. [1 ]
Ingram, H. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Twente, Fac Engn Technol, Enschede, Netherlands
[2] Univ Arizona, Southwest Ctr, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[3] Univ Calif Irvine, Sch Social Ecol, Irvine, CA 92717 USA
关键词
Ambiguity; Natural resources management; Water management; Water policy; Collective decision making; Knowledge production process; Multiple ways of knowing; Participation; Framing; NATURAL-RESOURCES; ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT; KNOWLEDGE; ORGANIZATIONS; UNCERTAINTY; SCIENCE; VALUES;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsci.2011.10.005
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Despite the claims of inclusiveness advanced by integrative approaches to resource management, the substance of decisions hardly reflect the diversity of meanings and interpretations that the inclusion of multiple actors implies. We assess the knowledge production processes currently employed in natural resources management, particularly water resources, and claim that part of this problem resides in how ambiguity is handled. From this perspective, we suggest that coping with ambiguity requires a reformulation of the knowledge production processes employed, in terms of the types of knowledge used, how and by whom it is created, what values are incorporated and how values are weighted. Here, we discuss the flawed assumptions of the operative knowledge production processes and the characteristics and challenges of knowledge production models better able to cope with ambiguity through integrative practices. Finally, we provide practical recommendations to facilitate implementation of knowledge co-production processes that can better actualize integration based on deliberation, open space for dialogue, negotiation and learning. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:60 / 71
页数:12
相关论文
共 90 条
[1]   DISMANTLING THE DIVIDE BETWEEN INDIGENOUS AND SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE [J].
AGRAWAL, A .
DEVELOPMENT AND CHANGE, 1995, 26 (03) :413-439
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, DELIBERATIVE POLICY
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, RULES GAME GAME RULE
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2005, SWIMMING UPSTREAM CO
[5]  
[Anonymous], MAKING SENSE INTRACT
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1995, DOMINION
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2010, States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order
[8]  
Argyris C., 1978, Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective
[9]  
Barreteau O, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15
[10]  
Berkes F., 2018, SACRED ECOLOGY, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203928950