Sensitometric evaluation of four dental X-ray films using five processing solutions

被引:6
作者
Syriopoulos, K [1 ]
Velders, XL [1 ]
Sanderink, GCH [1 ]
van Ginkel, FC [1 ]
van der Stelt, PF [1 ]
机构
[1] Acad Ctr Dent Amsterdam, Dept Oral Radiol, ACTA, NL-1066 EA Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
radiography; dental; X-ray film;
D O I
10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600415
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: To compare the sensitometric properties of four dental films: Ektaspeed Plus and Ultra-speed (Kodak Eastman Co, Rochester, USA) and new and previous Dentus M2 (Agfa-Gevaert, Mortsel, Belgium) in five different processing solutions. Methods: Characteristic curves were constructed for four dental X-ray films using five different processing solutions. All films were processed manually in three sets of chemicals for manual processing: Agfa (Heraeus Kulzer, Dormagen, Germany), Kodak (Kodak-Pathe, Paris, France) and Demat (Viscopac, Athens, Greece) and two sets of chemicals for automatic processing: Durr XR and Periomat (Durr Dental, Bietigheim-Bissingen, Germany). Analysis of variance and regression analysis was performed to examine the factors significantly affecting film density. Results: The new Dentus M2 film had comparable gradient, higher speed and lower base-plus-fog than its predecessor. It had comparable speed with Ektaspeed Plus in chemicals for automatic processing. All films had a higher speed and lower gradient when processed in the chemicals for automatic processing. The highest film speed was achieved using Durr XR chemicals. Conclusions: The new Agfa Dentus M2 him is an E-speed film and can be considered an alternative to Ektaspeed Plus: both can be recommended for use in dental practice as they contribute to dose reduction.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 79
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Densitometric evaluation of four radiographic processing solutions [J].
Akdeniz, BG ;
Lomcali, G .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 1998, 27 (02) :102-106
[2]  
Boere G, 1990, Dentomaxillofac Radiol, V19, P49
[3]   OBJECTIVE AND SUBJECTIVE EVALUATIONS OF KODAK EKTASPEED-PLUS DENTAL-X-RAY FILM [J].
CONOVER, GL ;
HILDEBOLT, CF ;
ANTHONY, D .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1995, 79 (02) :246-250
[4]   A COMPARISON OF 6 INTRAORAL X-RAY-FILMS [J].
CONOVER, GL ;
HILDEBOLT, CF ;
ANTHONY, D .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 1995, 24 (03) :169-172
[5]   A COMPARISON OF EKTASPEED AND ULTRASPEED FILMS USING MANUAL AND AUTOMATIC PROCESSING SOLUTIONS [J].
FLETCHER, JC .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1987, 63 (01) :94-102
[6]   RADIATION-DOSES OF COMMONLY USED DENTAL RADIOGRAPHIC SURVEYS [J].
FREEMAN, JP ;
BRAND, JW .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1994, 77 (03) :285-289
[7]   SURVEY OF RADIOLOGIC PRACTICES AMONG DENTAL PRACTITIONERS [J].
GOREN, AD ;
SCIUBBA, JJ ;
FRIEDMAN, R ;
MALAMUD, H .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1989, 67 (04) :464-468
[8]   In vitro comparison of Kodak Ultra-speed, Ektaspeed, and Ektaspeed Plus, and Agfa M2 comfort dental x-ray films for the detection of caries [J].
Hintze, H ;
Christoffersen, L ;
Wenzel, A .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1996, 81 (02) :240-244
[9]  
HINTZE H, 1993, SCAND J DENT RES, V101, P52
[10]   REVIEW ARTICLE - RADIATION PROTECTION IN DENTAL RADIOLOGY [J].
HORNER, K .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1994, 67 (803) :1041-1049