Quantifying Colocalization by Correlation: The Pearson Correlation Coefficient is Superior to the Mander's Overlap Coefficient

被引:774
作者
Adler, Jeremy [1 ]
Parmryd, Ingela [1 ]
机构
[1] Stockholm Univ, Wenner Gren Inst, S-10691 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
correlation; colocalization; co-occurrence; Mander's overlap coefficient; Pearson correlation coefficient; COLOR CONFOCAL IMAGES; QUANTITATIVE-ANALYSIS; MICROSCOPY; CELLS; PROTEINS;
D O I
10.1002/cyto.a.20896
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) and the Mander's overlap coefficient (MOC) are used to quantify the degree of colocalization between fluorophores. The MOC was introduced to overcome perceived problems with the PCC. The two coefficients are mathematically similar, differing in the use of either the absolute intensities (MOC) or of the deviation from the mean (PCC). A range of correlated datasets, which extend to the limits of the PCC, only evoked a limited response from the MOC. The PCC is unaffected by changes to the offset while the MOC increases when the offset is positive. Both coefficients are independent of gain. The MOC is a confusing hybrid measurement, that combines correlation with a heavily weighted form of co-occurrence, favors high intensity combinations, downplays combinations in which either or both intensities are low and ignores blank pixels. The PCC only measures correlation. A surprising finding was that the addition of a second uncorrelated population can substantially increase the measured correlation, demonstrating the importance of excluding background pixels. Overall, since the MOC is unresponsive to substantial changes in the data and is hard to interpret, it is neither an alternative to nor a useful substitute for the PCC. The MOC is not suitable for making measurements of colocalization either by correlation or co-occurrence. (C) 2010 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry
引用
收藏
页码:733 / 742
页数:10
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Replicate-based noise corrected correlation for accurate measurements of colocalization [J].
Adler, J. ;
Pagakis, S. N. ;
Parmryd, I. .
JOURNAL OF MICROSCOPY, 2008, 230 (01) :121-133
[2]  
ADLER J, 2008, MICROSC ANAL, V155, P7
[3]   Untitled [J].
Adler, Jeremy ;
Parmryd, Ingela .
JOURNAL OF MICROSCOPY-OXFORD, 2007, 227 (01) :83-83
[4]   A guided tour into subcellular colocalization analysis in light microscopy [J].
Bolte, S. ;
Cordelieres, F. P. .
JOURNAL OF MICROSCOPY, 2006, 224 (213-232) :213-232
[5]   VARIABLES ON SCATTERPLOTS LOOK MORE HIGHLY CORRELATED WHEN THE SCALES ARE INCREASED [J].
CLEVELAND, WS ;
DIACONIS, P ;
MCGILL, R .
SCIENCE, 1982, 216 (4550) :1138-1141
[6]  
Costes SV, 2004, BIOPHYS J, V86, P3993, DOI [10.1529/biophysj.103.038422, 10.1529/biophysi.103.038422]
[7]   Multicolour analysis and local image correlation in confocal microscopy [J].
Demandolx, D ;
Davoust, J .
JOURNAL OF MICROSCOPY, 1997, 185 :21-36
[8]   Colocalization of fluorescent markers in confocal microscope images of plant cells [J].
French, Andrew P. ;
Mills, Steven ;
Swarup, Ranjan ;
Bennett, Malcolm J. ;
Pridmore, Tony P. .
NATURE PROTOCOLS, 2008, 3 (04) :619-628
[9]   Amyloid-β colocalizes with apolipoprotein B in absorptive cells of the small intestine [J].
Galloway, Susan ;
Takechi, Ryusuke ;
Pallebage-Gamarallage, Menuka M. S. ;
Dhaliwal, Satvinder S. ;
Mamo, John C. L. .
LIPIDS IN HEALTH AND DISEASE, 2009, 8
[10]  
GILLHAM EM, 2001, LIFE F GALTON