Basal-like breast cancer defined by five biomarkers has superior prognostic value then triple-negative phenotype

被引:903
作者
Cheang, Maggie C. U. [1 ,2 ]
Voduc, David [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Bajdik, Chris [3 ]
Leung, Samuel [1 ,2 ]
McKinney, Steven [1 ,2 ]
Chia, Stephen K. [4 ]
Perou, Charles M. [5 ]
Nielsen, Torsten O. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] British Columbia Canc Agcy, Vancouver Coastal Hlth Res Inst, Genet Pathol Evaluat Ctr, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[3] BC Canc Agcy, Canc Control Res Program, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[4] BC Canc Agcy, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[5] Univ N Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC USA
关键词
D O I
10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1658
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Basal-like breast cancer is associated with high grade, poor prognosis, and younger patient age. Clinically, a triple-negative phenotype definition [estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)-2, all negative] is commonly used to identify such cases. EGFR and cytokeratin 5/6 are readily available positive markers of basal-like breast cancer applicable to standard pathology specimens. This study directly compares the prognostic significance between three- and five-biomarker surrogate panels to define intrinsic breast cancer subtypes, using a large clinically annotated series of breast tumors. Experimental Design: Four thousand forty-six invasive breast cancers were assembled into tissue microarrays. All had staging, pathology, treatment, and outcome information; median follow-up was 12.5 years. Cox regression analyses and likelihood ratio tests compared the prognostic significance for breast cancer death-specific survival (BCSS) of the two immunohistochemical panels. Results: Among 3,744 interpretablecases, 17%werebasalusingthetriple-negativedefinition (10-year BCSS, 67%) and 9% were basal using the five-marker method (10-year BCSS, 62%). Likelihood ratio tests of multivariable Cox models including standard clinical variables show that the five-marker panel is significantly more prognostic than the three-marker panel. The poor prognosis of triple-negative phenotype is conferred almost entirely by those tumors positive for basal markers. Among triple-negative patients treated with adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy, the additional positive basal markers identified a cohort of patients with significantly worse outcome. Conclusions: The expanded surrogate immunopanel of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, human HER-2, EGFR, and cytokeratin 5/6 provides a more specific definition of basal-like breast cancer that better predicts breast cancer survival.
引用
收藏
页码:1368 / 1376
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Basal-like breast carcinomas: clinical outcome and response to chemotherapy
    Banerjee, S.
    Reis-Filho, J. S.
    Ashley, S.
    Steele, D.
    Ashworth, A.
    Lakhani, S. R.
    Smith, I. E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2006, 59 (07) : 729 - 735
  • [2] Descriptive analysis of estrogen receptor (ER)negative, progesterone receptor (PR)-negative, and HER2-negative invasive breast cancer, the so-called triple-negative phenotype - A population-based study from the California Cancer Registry
    Bauer, Katrina R.
    Brown, Monica
    Cress, Rosemary D.
    Parise, Carol A.
    Caggiano, Vincent
    [J]. CANCER, 2007, 109 (09) : 1721 - 1728
  • [3] Statistics notes - Survival probabilities (the Kaplan-Meier method)
    Bland, JM
    Altman, DG
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 317 (7172) : 1572 - 1572
  • [4] The logrank test
    Bland, JM
    Altman, DG
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 328 (7447): : 1073 - 1073
  • [5] Molecular classification and molecular forecasting of breast cancer: Ready for clinical application?
    Brenton, JD
    Carey, LA
    Ahmed, AA
    Caldas, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (29) : 7350 - 7360
  • [6] Amplification of EMSY, a novel oncogene on 11q13, in high grade ovarian surface epithelial carcinomas
    Brown, LA
    Irving, J
    Parker, R
    Kim, H
    Press, JZ
    Longacre, TA
    Chia, S
    Magliocco, A
    Makretsov, N
    Gilks, B
    Pollack, J
    Huntsman, D
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2006, 100 (02) : 264 - 270
  • [7] The triple negative paradox: Primary tumor chemosensitivity of breast cancer subtypes
    Carey, Lisa A.
    Dees, E. Claire
    Sawyer, Lynda
    Gatti, Lisa
    Moore, Dominic T.
    Collichio, Frances
    Ollila, David W.
    Sartor, Carolyn I.
    Graham, Mark L.
    Perou, Charles M.
    [J]. CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2007, 13 (08) : 2329 - 2334
  • [8] Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study
    Carey, Lisa A.
    Perou, Charles M.
    Livasy, Chad A.
    Dressler, Lynn G.
    Cowan, David
    Conway, Kathleen
    Karaca, Gamze
    Troester, Melissa A.
    Tse, Chiu Kit
    Edmiston, Sharon
    Deming, Sandra L.
    Geradts, Joseph
    Cheang, Maggie C. U.
    Nielsen, Torsten O.
    Moorman, Patricia G.
    Earp, H. Shelton
    Millikan, Robert C.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2006, 295 (21): : 2492 - 2502
  • [9] Immunohistochemical detection using the new rabbit monoclonal antibody SP1 of estrogen receptor in breast cancer is superior to mouse monoclonal antibody 1D5 in predicting survival
    Cheang, Maggie C. U.
    Treaba, Diana O.
    Speers, Caroline H.
    Olivotto, Ivo A.
    Bajdik, Chris D.
    Chia, Stephen K.
    Goldstein, Lynn C.
    Gelmon, Karen A.
    Huntsman, David
    Gilks, C. Blake
    Nielsen, Torsten O.
    Gown, Allen M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (36) : 5637 - 5644
  • [10] Breast cancer molecular subclassification and estrogen receptor expression to predict efficacy of adjuvant anthracyclines-based chemotherapy: a biomarker study from two randomized trials
    Conforti, R.
    Boulet, T.
    Tomasic, G.
    Taranchon, E.
    Arriagada, R.
    Spielmann, M.
    Ducourtieux, M.
    Soria, J. C.
    Tursz, T.
    Delaloge, S.
    Michiels, S.
    Andre, F.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2007, 18 (09) : 1477 - 1483